Auto-translated
He thinks he's a bird. Maybe he is?
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
He thought he was a bird. Maybe?
No, you misunderstood me; I didn't think of myself as a bird. I mean, when he was vomiting, he tilted his head so far down that he fell out of the window.
A man comes to a cafe on a cliff and orders albatross meat. After it's brought to him, he cuts off a piece, eats it, opens the window, and jumps off the cliff. The question is, why?
P.S. I don't know the answer.
You are on a TV show and are offered to open one of three doors. Behind one of the doors is a car, and behind the other two, there is nothing. You choose one of the doors, and the host opens one of the remaining two doors, revealing that there is no car behind it. You are then offered to change your decision (take the other door from the two remaining). The question is - does it make sense to do this?
I believe it doesn't matter, as the chance of choosing the door with the car is 50%.
From a logical point of view, yes, but in reality, it's not like that, and the decision needs to be changed.
Let's say there are three doors - 1, 2, and 3. A car is behind the first door.
If we initially chose the first door, then to win, we don't need to change our decision.
If we chose the second door, then we need to change our decision.
If we chose the third door, then we need to change our decision.
Therefore, in two cases, we need to change our decision, and in one case, we don't, so the chances of winning by changing the door are 2/3.
You are on a TV show and are offered to open one of three doors. Behind one of the doors is a car, and behind the other two, there is nothing. You choose one of the doors, and the host opens one of the remaining two doors, revealing that there is no car behind it. You are then offered to change your decision (take the other door from the two remaining). The question is - does it make sense to do so?