Posts from Which monster do you like the most in Heroes 5 (level 4)?

I don't know, for example, I don't consider succubi to be just a nice addition, but rather a core unit for the demon army, even before the Pit Lord appears (and even after). They can be used to clear out neutral creatures without losses, and even towards the end, they don't become weaker like many early-level units do. This is a rare unit that remains effective even in the late game. By the way, the same can be said about the new druids, while the riders are not as useful in the late game.

Riders are also useful in prolonged stages of the game. Consider that if you let the Riders spread out and attack creatures of levels 5-7, they won't survive (+if there's a mismatch in elements or bad luck, they definitely won't stand a chance). And upgrading the Riders can also significantly damage your army if you don't keep an eye on them or eliminate them in time.

but late-game riders aren't as useful.

You're wrong, Alucard, and shaddar is right – after the riders' attack, no unit can survive! And the Succubus has become a not-so-great unit! They have low initiative, so they'll be taken out before they can use their charm ability! I also didn't like the Battle Mages! Well, it's not really relevant, but I apologize!

Of course, vampires are great. Succubi too. And as for the druids, I think they turned out well, both in terms of combat abilities and appearance.

for me, the Druids are still more interesting!

Of course, the Dark Riders! :) The way they charge and impale with their spears! :smile54: And they have a good amount of hit points and deal decent damage! :) If you use them with melee units, especially with fast-moving Furies, they become VERY dangerous! :smile54: !:) !:smile54:

Archmages have become more appealing to me; they deal decent damage, and the fact that they no longer attack randomly is a big plus. Now I can consistently protect them, which is what I do.

by the way, about mages... I was playing a duel against the computer, and I got the Oracle...
and my mages (alternative upgrade) damaged the golems with a shot, which were mine =(... how is that possible? if they shouldn't harm their own units...

P.S. on the topic: out of all four tiers, I like Mages and Griffins the most =)

2Ar
Griffons? You even build them?))) Just kidding. It's just my opinion that it's a rather expensive unit, and it doesn't always make sense to build it. If I have money, I build them; if not, I don't.

Nazg, I judge by strength and usefulness)))
Griffons are quite strong, they can handle anything and can fly away when they need to hold out))
And I like mages because of the Fireball... it's very effective =). And I shoot well, hitting everyone at once)

Lizards are weak.
Druids' mages aren't very good, and they don't shoot well either...
I don't like succubi and vampires...
Berserkers aren't very durable either...
Shamans... only buffs, and I don't like them as warriors... and they don't move fast... the chain is not very effective...
Although they all have their uses, but those two are the ones I like the most)

P.S. I mainly judge based on duels, as I haven't played many scenarios)).

In general, lizards are expendable units. They only need to withstand one wave of enemies, and then they can die. Shamans are also useful; Orcs don't have great initiative, so they make up for it. (As long as there are available slots, I always have half shamans.) Theoretically, Earth Daughters can break through enemies who are defending with readiness, because their ability ignores this readiness, and the Daughters still attack without retaliation (a bug or a feature?). I don't know how effective it is, but you can at least take down some combat griffons this way. Alternate Berserkers are tough; they hit very hard, but they die quickly. Griffons are undoubtedly good, but they die quickly... And the AI loves to target them. And un-upgraded ones aren't very effective; upgrading them is very expensive.

Griffins are quite durable.

Are these weaklings really that durable?))) Only the combat griffins are durable; the others don't hold up well under attack.

Griffins are undoubtedly good, but they die quickly... And the AI loves to target them. Also, unimproved griffins aren't very useful, and improving them is very expensive.

That's exactly what I'm saying. Either upgrade them quickly, or don't build them at all.

Nazg, I judge by strength and usefulness)))
Griffons are quite strong, they can handle anything and can fly away when they need to hold out))
And I like mages because of the fireball... it's very effective =). And I shoot well, hitting everyone at once)

Lizards are weak.

Are lizards weak?:eek: What does weak mean? Find another level 4 creature with 60 health, 7-14 damage, 10 attack, 9 defense, 8 speed, 11 initiative!:smile54:
The other creatures have almost twice as low stats!! And if you take the charge attack! Then no one will last long!:D Also, the rider bites attacked enemies on adjacent squares! :D And who is weak? They do have low growth, but in terms of stats, lizards are closer to level 5 than to level 4!! And whether 4 or 5 is better is not even a question!!! :smile54: :) :smile54:

Only Battle Griffons can compete with them, but they are weaker!:D

To be honest, I never really liked the Knight faction, but I occasionally play as them because of three creatures: Griffins, Champions, and Angels. Otherwise, I really like all the level 4 monsters.

I will give my vote
Only to demonesses!
They sit there, bored,
And without coffee! Without espresso!