Posts from Attention! Floodscar 2008.
Auto-translated
Added 1 minute ago
P.S.: I also think Hacker would be a good candidate, but I'm just more familiar with Whirlwind.
I know Vayshan better than anyone on this forum :) Because I'm in the same class with him. But don't think that I'm giving him my vote just because we're friends. He's a serious person, both on the forum and in real life; his opinions are always well-founded and, as a rule, well-argued. He doesn't say unnecessary things, and that's a sign of seriousness and a mature perspective on the essence of things :) He doesn't post a lot of messages per day because he doesn't write in topics like "The most beautiful creature in the city of humans" and so on. This also says a lot; he doesn't care who's in his avatar or how many birds he has... That's why I decided to give him my vote.
P.S. No offense to those who write in these topics)) I didn't mean that posting there is a sign of unseriousness - it's just that there are people who successfully pad their post count there without being accused of spamming or anything like that. :)
Bow down and hear our cry,
Our earthly rulers falter,
Our people drift and die,
The walls of gold entomb us,
The swords of scorn divide,
Take not thy thunder from us,
Take away our pride.
G.K. Chesterton: English Hymnal
ATTENTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Surprisingly, there are many forum users who fit this nomination; the forum is very good both in terms of casual chatting and serious discussions (especially the section dedicated to Heroes 4), but, strangely enough, when I was creating this nomination, I already knew who I would vote for...
Major Whirlwind
Whirlwind is not exactly an example of seriousness (see Creator))), and he often engages in casual chatting, but when I see that Whirlwind left the latest message in a thread, I will most likely go there, because I know that it won't be a 2-line post; it will be a detailed message with his opinion, with evidence and examples. It will be interesting to argue with him, as the discussion will be constructive and respectful to opponents, this is especially noticeable in the rather casual section about Heroes 5. I am giving my vote to Whirlwind without any hesitation.
I agree with your vote.
By the way, is this the complete list of participants?
вечный двигатель мира сего.
P.S. I would be more lenient towards the off-topic chatter; I think everyone has experienced it at some point. The main thing is that it doesn't happen in every message.
God save us everyone
Will we burn inside the fires of a thousand suns...
I still believe that forum members wouldn't just vote without knowing who the person is, so I'm in favor.
A) Doesn't write one-line posts (or two-line posts either)
B) His posts are always meaningful and thought out in detail
C) His advice is always effective (at least in the Dungeon, everything he says works)
D) He doesn't post in topics he doesn't understand (this is what I especially appreciate about him, so I try to do the same - as an example, you won't see posts about artifacts from me until at least a year from now, because I don't have time to deal with them)
E) And I will definitely check in and read if the last message in a topic is from Mdance...
That's pretty much it...
So many Gods
We were the prisoners of our own fantasy
But now we are marching
Against these Gods
I'm the wizard, I will change it all
Valhalla - Deliverance
Why've you ever forgotten me
19.08.2008 СК Олимпийский.Я запомню это навсегда!!!
Как играть онлайн в Герои 5??Ответ здесь
Where do we end up when we save the world?
P.S. I practically don't know Major Vortex, Vaishan, Mdance... Maybe they are really serious people... However...
Лидер клана "Из многих единое"
Приключения – это сплошные неприятности, только про них почему-то потом интересно вспоминать...


"Мы не герои. Мы сильны. Мы упрямы. Мы стараемся соблюдать условия контракта. Но мы не умираем за проигравших." Костоправ
"Мы не поклонники честной игры, если ее можно избежать. Девиз Отряда – максимальная эффективность при минимальном риске." Костоправ
_______________
without commentary






