Although maybe this can be called an alternate reality
Although maybe this can be called an alternate reality
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
The series left the impression of chewing gum, which initially had a very pleasant taste, but then it suddenly became tasteless and even slightly unpleasant, and there was no trash can nearby, so I had to keep chewing it until the very end.
I don't remember when I stopped watching, trying to do it in a similar way – maybe at the end of season 2? Definitely after the bunker, the "others," and the "numbers" were found, but before it – as far as I know from rumors – turned into an absolute fan fiction.
Maybe around the third season, when I already saw these twists, I also saw the structure of the subsequent narrative and realized that this structure would not lead to anything good in the future and was designed specifically to keep the viewer hooked by gradually feeding them crumbs of a schizophrenic plot to maintain pseudo-interest. This is really sad because, even though I'm not a big fan of – but I accept as a given – various flashbacks throughout an entire series and all sorts of things, I really enjoyed the first season and a certain part (or even almost all) of the second.
At one point, I just sensed that nothing good would happen next, and based on my feelings and knowledge about the series' decline, I dropped it. But overall, I don't consider this a loss; even taking into account the sunk cost factor (🤓), even without a resolution, it's a cool series at the beginning, and it can definitely be watched without finishing it if you don't suffer from the syndrome of "I'll start, and if I don't finish, it's a disaster, I need a canonical or at least some kind of ending." If you want some kind of very intellectual and entertaining adventure for a while, then why not.
I remembered an interesting moment from life – once I was talking to my dad on the phone, maybe he wasn't living with us at that time, or maybe he was, but he had gone somewhere, and he says: I saw this series on prime-time TV, and it's super cool, it's called SURVIVE. For some reason, I remember this, it sounded very funny.
2) Found Loken's review, but it's about the second and third seasons, and he writes about a lot of drawn-out scenes where nothing happens; I don't remember the original well, but it was probably like that.
Returning to this review – since then, I've come across some highlight reels from that season on YouTube, and they were quite cool. Of course, this is taking into account the boring scenes and everything else, but it seems to me that the series, like wine, rather than milk, matures with age, both for itself and for the viewer.
It's really good, and I don't regret a single second spent watching it. Perhaps at the time of the review in this thread, I slightly lowered the rating due to subjective factors, but since then, seasons 4, 5, and 6 have also been released, and they are simply excellent, and even seasons 1, 2, and 3 are very, very good.
If you were to ask me at gunpoint: out of everything you've watched, which series would you call the best? Salich would definitely be at the top; it has a lot of cool, interesting things, excellent acting, interesting plots and characters, and even some cool twists – although I personally don't consider this a super-plus, but rather a nice bonus, but even that exists. In general, me and Sivo recommend it.
So, it seems like they all just died and were hanging out in purgatory... like, right there
Although maybe it can be called an alternate reality
I personally find it less interesting to follow Mike, but it's still more engaging than following Hank's wife, and Mike gets much less screen time.
Pros
thought it was Mel Gibson? Turns out it was Ridley Scott.
This is Edward Norton... xD
The movie is good, yes.
Give Me Wings (Donne-moi des ailes, 2019, France)
A film about how 100% of adult humans constantly act crazy, cluck over the fulfillment of strange and meaningless rules, brazenly, stupidly, and pointlessly break those same rules, argue over nonsense, laze around, and in general behave like total infants and cowards; watching them was nauseating. And only a 14-year-old boy stood out from the rest? He just stepped up and showed how to be a man, set a good goal, and bravely achieved it.
The film is only good because of him; otherwise, the behavior of the adults could have been perceived as normal. But—it worked through contrast.
The Passion of the Christ (The Passion of the Christ, 2004, USA)
I actually wanted to say more about this film; the previous one was more like a short warm-up.
First of all, when I started the movie, I was slightly surprised by which voiceover I had downloaded. I listened to the speakers for a bit—the language was completely unfamiliar. Then I reached a moment where two Roman soldiers are talking to each other, and it hits me that they are doing so in Latin... And the Jews among themselves—obviously, in Aramaic! The director set himself an extremely ambitious task: to film a movie in the native languages of Rome and Israel during the 1st century AD, and he executed it. First conclusion: maximum meticulousness.
We boldly turn on the subtitles and keep watching; practically every subsequent scene continues to convince us of the meticulousness of the production regarding the most important days in human history. With a correction only for traditions accepted in Catholicism but not confirmed in the Gospels—for example, the scene with Saint Veronica, who wiped Jesus with a veil.
But even more important than the fact that the correct events are happening on screen is how it is shown, with what pain. No embellishments, no "child-friendly" rating; we feel as if we are there and suffer along with Him, seeing this blood and these tears for people who have no pity for Him, while He does for them. It must have been incredibly difficult to portray Christ as so human yet so divine, and all the other people are also in their proper place.
The Apostles are in fear, but some cope with it better than others, while some, alas, fall completely. His Mother and Mary Magdalene accompany Him all the way to Golgotha, as their hearts command them. Pilate is not like Bulgakov's, where he suddenly has a headache for some reason; this one is of sound mind and memory. He seems to pity Jesus, and he hates the high priests, but politics dictate that he act his own way; he is first and foremost a Roman governor, and then a man, and these wrong priorities do him a bad service. Herod only cares for giggles and laughs—no matter, we know he'll have time to cry later. The acting is such that you, the viewer, feel as if you have known all these people for many years, and all their thoughts and aspirations, doubts and decisions are visible as if through the crystal surface of a lake.
And the finale... Exactly as it should be, not like in some more irresponsible works. Those who have heard the title "The Gospel According to Tolstoy" know what I mean (and those who haven't—well, that's fine, then they don't need to worry in advance).
If you believe you are morally ready for such a movie, stock up on tissues for your tears and go ahead.