Perhaps life is a test, after which only the best will enter the real world, where everyone is happy, and so on.
Or perhaps life is already a gift that not everyone receives...
Or is it just a game?
Feel free to suggest your own ideas.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
a real world where everyone is happy, and so on.
Don't you think that a person won't be able to feel happiness without knowing what it means to lack it?
Make him feel bad, and then restore everything to how it was.
Essentially, life can turn out to be both a gift and a misfortune.
However, it seems to me that in life, there is a diametrically opposite trend...
We are born, and we die: we are given the happiness of living a life, and then, when it is sad to part with it, it is taken away...
This is doubly upsetting...
What does death have to do with it? Is death observed in life? Firstly, death ends life, rather than being one of its events. Secondly, if we are not talking about violent or premature death, the dying person does not always yearn for life. Many elderly people look forward to death, and sometimes, given that their tools for experiencing life are either unable to function or are not being used, their desire is quite understandable.
Really? Death ends life, but why isn't it its event? Life and death are inextricably linked. After all, a "gift" is literally taken away. So, it's not a gift.
And, to be honest, I haven't met many people who aren't afraid of death. Yes, the "tools of knowledge" are not able to function, but the desire to live does not leave! Here, it's already a literal animal fear of death... in such moments, it's hard to think about knowledge. The only exception, perhaps, is people whose every day is filled with pain or something like that. They really want death.
Perhaps we don't quite understand each other, but I'll try to clarify my point.
You (is it okay if I use "you"?), argued that life is not a gift, but a trial, because life ends in death. But that's not entirely logical.
Let me give an example.
Let's say a man meets a girl, a beautiful, intelligent, kind, and lovely girl, and he falls in love with her. She reciprocates, they spend several wonderful years together, and then she falls out of love with him and leaves. And this man says: "Yes, those relationships weren't a gift! Because she left me in the end!" Is such a statement fair? Yes, the breakup was part of the relationship, and it was painful. But weren't the years of their relationship wonderful? Can something be called not good enough just because it "ended"?
A juicy, delicious piece of meat served for lunch is bad because you've already eaten it and regret that there isn't more?
Even if we continue the analogy with gifts that are given (although I think the author of the topic meant "life as a gift" in the sense of "life is wonderful"), is a music player that has broken down from old age bad just because it's not eternal?
Don't be so categorical. Maybe you haven't interacted much with elderly people, that is, those who are really tired of life? I've seen some who, at 75, were full of life, energy, and their minds were clear; but I've also seen those who said every day: "Take me, Lord!" And honestly, after 70, the latter option is much more common...