Posts from What would your ideal army look like? Auto-translated

I find that 6 fire elementals are enough for me by the 2nd week ;)

I prefer 1 Azure Dragon in the 1st week.:rolleyes:

1-Centaur
2-Lizard Warrior
3-Griffon
4-Crusader
5-Gorgon
6-Death Knight
7-Archangel
This army could definitely benefit from the "Sword of the Alliance" artifact.

I think archers are better than lizard warriors.

2 monarch: lizard-warrior is also a ranger ;)

I mean a ranged unit, like an archer (from a Castle).

No, these are two completely different things... :) Archers will win due to their speed.

I understand that the author wants to know which units of different levels we prefer (this will be the ideal army). Here is mine: 1 - Captains of Centaurs 2 - Harpy Witches 3 - Cerberuses 4 - Vampire Lords 5 - Mighty Gorgons 6 - Dread Knights (they are essential) 7 - Black Dragons I've been playing for a while, and these units have never let me down...

I think that archers are better than lizard warriors.

Yes, you might be right; I didn't consider archers with 2 arrows:smile07:

And I’ll probably write about the army that such a modest character as Ley dreams of :

1) Captain-centaurs (sometimes you can get a Phoenix)
2) Storm elementals (archers are needed :))
3) Definitely Cerberuses
4) Absolutely necessary :) - Vampire Lords
5) Well, you can't do without these - Mighty Gargoyles
6) Naga Queens
7) Archangels (sometimes Phoenixes, due to fire immunity and speed ;))

I mainly rely on these guys :D

Well, it depends on the situation. It depends on who you're fighting, whether melee/range units are neutral or if the opponent (hero) has a melee/range unit advantage. You need to act according to the situation and predict how events will unfold. Each unit has its own advantages and disadvantages and is used for "its" purposes. I think it's pointless to argue and answer in such topics; it just leads to irrelevant chatter.

Sincerely, K0Lb@zzeR.

I envision my ideal army as being strong and fast. And I prefer to include units with a speed of at least 11 whenever possible. But if we consider levels: 1 - Captain of Centaurs (speed 8) 2 - Storm Elemental (speed 8) 3 - Royal Griffin (speed 8) 4 - Vampire Lord (speed 9) 5 - Master Djinn (speed 11) or Thunder Bird (speed 11) 6 - Knight of Death (speed 9) 7 - Archangel (speed 18). If there's a morale problem, the first level is replaced with upgraded Fairies. The army is based on the hero having the Ballistics skill and not having the Archery skill.

How do you like these army compositions? 1) Master Gremlins 2) Arbalests 3) Orc Chieftains 4) Archmages 5) Fanatics 6) Cyclops 7) Titans 1) Hobbits 2) Arbalests 3) Grand Elves 4) Snipers 5) Fanatics 6) Wizards 7) Titans Hero Orrin + Sniper Bow + Expert Marksman + Sphere of Inhibition!!

2 Dirty_Player: No, that won't work... Too many archers – it's an overkill! An Archmage could do a lot of damage... It's necessary to be able to rationally combine your forces in the army and the kingdom; otherwise, frankly speaking, there are few chances of winning...

2 Ley
Why not? You said it as if I created the worst army ever...
It's not that bad. I think that under certain conditions, it could be very dangerous! I had an idea a long time ago to buff Orrin and test it out, but I couldn't make it work...

I used to use this method. It only works in very rare cases... :) But combining two types of armies is definitely something you can do while enjoying a beer ;). As always, everything depends on the specific in-game situation...