Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
mafs didn't start using status checks for some reason.
What's so bad about that? Why would mafs need to know the status if they can just throw a block? They're not going to be baptizing kids with towns. I generally agree more with Romeo, but regarding who would kill, I could easily argue, here I don't see a clear picture. She could have just as easily told the princess, "loser, kill yourself," as Balzac could have explained that his dreams of friendship are just a lure, which is why he killed himself.
Why Grande? Because Romeo hanged himself due to unrequited love; this is a hint at the role of the killer.
It says he was strangled with a loop, and then it talks about civilization and mental health. So, they were trying to simulate a suicide, which makes it more like an improvisation by Balzac, especially considering it was a loop and not a rope, for example. This means they used whatever was at hand. Author
And the clue is probably about civilization (e.g., China) and mental health (e.g., Confucianism). It stands out too much.
I disagree; what stands out is "strangled with a loop," not just "strangled," "found hanged," or "hanged." Civilization and mental health are too vague and nonspecific.
In general, in my opinion, the hint about who killed him might be in both the clue and the subsequent description at the same time.
Added 2 minutes later Author
You don't have it either, and if I dig up dirt on you, will you start yelling?
Why? I'm just being friendly 😏 Morning
He ran towards the loop, and Romeo jumped into it instead of him, so that it couldn't be used anymore.
They just wanted to kill him by strangling, but they ran into Romeo's patrol and took him out.
From Montezuma to the hanged Cuauhtémoc, you can easily navigate using the links at the beginning of the Wikipedia articles.
Well, not at the beginning, but in the footnotes on the right? Okay, it looks better than mine.
Regarding Balzac, I'll say this: everything is possible, but we need to consider Revan's overall mood regarding the current experience. At the beginning of the night, without any killings or Balzac references, he expressed the thought that the chariot of civilization is heading in the wrong direction (yes, I Googled it), so I'll refrain from drawing conclusions... Especially since we would then have two Balzac-related roles that could be killers (no, actually, Goriot should have blocked, but the implicit use of information from one part of the newspaper in another part? Oh well!).
So far, it seems I was the one doing the killing, and I even specifically mentioned a correct clue from the newspaper in my post, so there was no way I could be suspected. And the Master – my teammate – is framing me.
In general, in my opinion, the hint about who was the killer could be both in the clue and in the subsequent description at the same time.
Mastermind-esque.Author
So far, it seems that I was the killer, and I specifically mentioned the correct clue from the newspaper in my post so that I couldn't be suspected. And Master is my teammate and is covering for me.
Yes, you played it well... I'm almost ready to ask to join your team (just kidding).
Since the descriptions of the murders differ among the Mafia players, I'm inclined to think that Grande killed the Hero and that Romeo was most likely the victim (though we'll probably see tomorrow if anyone stalks anyone). Based on the description, she's a master of persuasion. She talked and talked until they voted for her, she talked someone to death... Especially if it's about someone hopelessly in love. Balzac's improvisation, as I see it, implies something musical, poetic. On the other hand, he's a philosopher, so he could also have developed suicidal thoughts. And Goriot is out for obvious reasons. In general, if we assume that the Hero is Romeo, then the killer is most likely Grande, because she broke his heart. If the Hero is Morgana or Oren (unlikely, but I think he could fit the role of a good-natured person, given Revan's twisted desire to make the newspaper descriptions as vague as possible), then Balzac could have been the one, if his "improvisation" is not musical but philosophical. The other roles don't fit the newspaper descriptions in any way. In any case, we've lost a valuable player with a clearly useful role.
For now, it seems that I was the one who did it, and I even specifically mentioned a key clue from the newspaper in my post, so there was no way I could be suspected. But the Master – my teammate – is now accusing me.
Yes, it was a good attempt, guys, but it didn't work out. That's life.
Yeah, I'm not good at playing as the Dungeon faction.
Okay, let's execute Arza, so that what happened at the end of the last game doesn't repeat itself. I'll look for clues tomorrow morning if I can.
By the way, Grande is also a Balzacian woman. And Louis, or rather, Jean-Louis, is also a well-known writer with the surname Balzac. Basically, half of the creatures here are inspired by Balzac (and the humans are mostly inspired by King Arthur), so get ready for melancholy, English heroic epics, and, to a lesser extent, Shakespeare (Pompeii, Romeo). If something else comes out of this, it's probably some Sumerian myth taking over...