Auto-translated
Cool game, but the only downside is that archers respond to attacks from other archers.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
It's a cool game, but the only downside is that ranged units counter ranged attacks.
I don't think it's a drawback. In my opinion, it's quite interesting.
Before me, there were already many negative comments about the 4th game, I won't repeat myself, I'll summarize - the 4th game is an amateurish work by the developers, to put it mildly. I would fix everything, starting with the graphics, the monsters all look ridiculous, etc.
and not just the graphics, but also the storyline.
Why do you think so? IMO, both the third and fourth games have equally excellent storylines.
Regarding the storyline: I don't know the story of the third game. And the graphics discouraged me from wanting to play it. The only thing I like is the ability to upgrade creatures.
I heard from some hardcore fans of the third game that the modernization is a negative, as it simply artificially prolongs the game. Although I think it's better for the game.
I don't know about the game being drawn out, IronAxe, I haven't played it.

I don't like the yellow menu! It would be better if it were green or blue.
If you can't understand the fourth installment, then there's no need to shout about it... Your behavior is definitely not that of a HERO:smile27:
And there's no point in just shouting about the fact that you simply didn't understand the game:smile08:
P.S. Participate in a tournament and earn at least some credibility to express yourself in such a TONE:smile34:
Since you think I don't understand this game, explain its essence to me.