Auto-translated
Perhaps it's not that significant, but in Equilibri, the AI demonstrates ingenuity when my army attacks neutral creatures and enemy troops. This is reflected in the troop deployment – it's more well-thought-out.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
I described my point of view; I like to play with one hero. It’s just more convenient for me. Of course, the hero must be good. If the hero is strong, then a large army theoretically makes the situation worse (I mean a large army that isn’t strong, but consists of many weak creatures). I’ll explain: let’s say in a battle, my enemy consists of griffins. My hero knows 5th-level Chaos magic and 1st-level Warfare (making the hero level 21). It will be easier for me to defeat the griffins with one hero than, say, with berserkers, centaurs, and thieves. First, it takes longer. Second, the enemy army will be divided into three squads in battle (because of my army). But if the hero is alone, there will be one squad of the enemy army. And it’s easier and faster for me to defeat one squad than several.
Or a Druid and an Archer:)) They take everyone down at the beginning... I've already described the tactic...
I haven't seen 15 angels guarding a sawmill yet :)) I'm basing my opinion on the number and quality of neutral creatures on the vast majority of maps ;)
And I don't have much gaming experience.
Why is he dumber in the 4th game??? What's the matter? Why couldn't they make him like in the 3rd game?
Why is the AI dumber in the 4th game??? What's the problem? Why couldn't they make it as good as in the 3rd game?