Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
we'll see at some point a completely incomprehensible jump from 300 rating to 700 (without any games).
This works and isn't displayed on x3tv if the accounts he played with are very new. My Android wasn't displayed anywhere either... most likely, it's a bunch of small accounts boosting each other, and games against players with a rating of, say, 200-300 for 2 months or more. g+U, I think it's something like that. Well, no one will let unknown players who haven't proven themselves by playing against "top" players into the tournament, so the only thing left is this absurd G+U, and I've already voiced my thoughts on how to solve it in the Hots thread... and the fact that it's enjoyable as a variety for viewers doesn't mean that it should attract adequate players with its abusiveness... they had their fun, and that's enough.
Jelen117Statistics
Registered:
Posts:603
Auto-translated
Regarding Norbiksu – he is a long-lost son of Maretti, a prominent Polish player, so it's not surprising that he gained 840 rating points in one night without even playing Heroes. This is a new era! Regarding G+U – it's a decent map, an interesting mix of Soda and Hota, as usual, those who don't play it criticize it. The essence is obviously in the rating system. The rating needs to be reworked, and in the meantime, I suggest changing the tournament rules. For example, at the end of the term, organize a mini-tournament with the top 5 players, where each participant adds one map (the first map is added by the fifth player, the second by the fourth player, and so on).
...at the end of the term, organize a mini-tournament for the top 5 players, where each participant adds one map template (the first template is added by the fifth player, the second by the fourth player, and so on).
That's a great idea, by the way. I agree.
p.s. And G+U is still G+U, no need, Wojtek, to justify your top 1 ranking by praising it)) you are a good player anyway, and you could have been top 1 in the ranking without all that nonsense.
Honestly, the "tournament" is becoming completely absurd, I agree with Chopa.
Besides the fact that even Org doesn't seem to understand the harm caused to the heroes by this very "ordinary template," a complete bacchanalia is starting to happen in the lobby ladder.
I already mentioned a player with the nickname Messiah in another thread, who has been consistently in the top 10 for a long time, but if you open his stats, you will see a completely incomprehensible jump from 300 rating to 700 at some point (without playing any games at all).
Now, a certain norbixu has appeared, with 70+ wins, 0 losses, and is in the top 2. At the same time, no one knows who he is. And it seems that someone will challenge him within this (non-)tournament!
I'm not even talking about Brabus, Garrosh, etc.
And everyone doesn't care, the most important thing is that Baratortchu apparently doesn't care. The end of the story.
Why did you decide that Org owes you anything and should understand something - that's one. The top 3 players, approved by me here in this thread, participate in the tournament and challenges. In the lobby, it can be the top 15, 20, and 55 - that's two. Playing in a tournament and not bothering to understand the rules is brilliant, that's three. Playing in a tournament for money and criticizing it is shameful, that's four.
You're better at streaming.
=Lizard=
Message from Jelen117 ...at the end of the term, hold a mini-tournament for the top 5 players, where each participant adds one template (the first template is added by the fifth player, the second by the fourth player, and so on). This is actually a good idea. I agree.
There is a non-zero probability that the top 5 amateur players, for example, Vasya, will be selected, and he will add an amateur template. Where is your logic?
Added 6 minutes ago I don't quite understand, g+u was banned on September 23, two days ago, what are these belated discussions? The wishes have been taken into account. And before September 23, I want g+u to play.
Chopa lost to g+u and tilted, which means he is not worthy of the title of Best, lol. The rules are the same for all players, and the prize is only for the Best - it's simple. Stop whining and complaining. The desire to support such skilled players with money is diminishing.
PS "harm to heroes" - I laughed. It should be recorded in the annals!!!
There are even more of them in the current rules - 7.
The Top 3 was chosen to increase the likelihood that the games will be played. Top 4 and 5 will simply give up, losing their chances.
Ah, I'm talking about a tournament regardless of the rating; too large an advantage could arise due to G+U. If the tournament started today, I would have an advantage of 100 points, and it's possible that the results of the tournament wouldn't matter at all. And I suggested a separate mini-tournament with 5 people.
osfaraonStatistics
Registered:
Posts:378
Auto-translated
The owners of the platform, which everyone loves, should be held accountable for fair play, protection against exploits, and the accuracy of the rating formula. Instead of trying to cover up their shortcomings within the tournament by imposing arbitrary rules that some like and others don't.
My job was to award prizes to the TOP1 players. If there are any issues with fairness or balance, that's something to be addressed with the platform's developers.
=Lizard=Statistics
Registered:
Posts:3,822
Auto-translated
"Shopa lost and tilted, which means he doesn't deserve to be top 1" - that's what made me laugh. Okay, Pharaoh, it's your tournament, your business, I just wanted what's best. Peace, bro. I'm going to play G&U, the system won...
Oh, this "which is better" debate is never-ending :D everyone's pulling in different directions, and in the end, the organizer is just freezing from all the posts :smile15:
Мой любимьій размер - тройка. Будь то конса, утопа или сиськи ICQ:5676388
HellLighTStatistics
Registered:
Posts:2,462
Auto-translated
There isn't really a problem with the game being fun on g+u (except for the fact that at some point, a turn starts to take 20-30 minutes for players), the problem is that with the current rating changes, winning a single game feels like doubling your points in a slot machine – it's quite random. And in the current situation, it seems unlikely that you can reach the top without playing on this template, and often, due to a lucky combination of circumstances, someone who is inconsistent in their heroes can end up in the lead (it reminds me of the mass SM games on Kiev Cape :D). Here, it's not so much the system that's broken, but rather the "all means are justified to win" mentality.
"Shopa lost and tilted, which means he's not worthy of being top 1" - that's what made me laugh. Okay, Pharaoh, it's your tournament, your business, I just wanted what's best. Peace, bro. I'm going to play G+U, the system won...
Kostya, peace. What do you think about a guy who has already won a prize, received it, and starts pulling tricks, like he's playing and then withdrawing - how should one react to this? At the same time, he positions himself as top 1 and claims to be the current best of the best. Participating in the collective is a voluntary matter, and the rules were published in advance. I even anticipated a ban from G+U.
ps I'll be happy to watch if you win 2-3 G+U games in a row xD
Shopa lost to G+U and tilted, so he doesn't deserve the title of Best.
Didn't play a single G+U game on my main account :) Maybe I don't deserve to be top 1 in the lobby, but I hope at least the HW rating won't be messed up by a stupid system.
Didn't played single G + U game on my main account :) Maybe i don't deserve to be top 1 lobby but i hope at least HW rating won't get fucked by stupid system.
How do you prohibit playing g + u on rapport HW. In a tournament I can at least introduce rules and restrictions. Everyone and anything (any templs) play on the XB Rating
HellLighT
