(none) - 2 — Online Tournaments

osfaraon

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Al Feyn

How does this reconcile with the phrase

?
Currently, the pool is not limited in any way. Choose any four absurd options, and one of them will be played.

It doesn't reconcile at all. This was a response to a message suggesting a change to the rules of point 5.

Why do you think that Enott, FTS, Bishop, Hellight, Lutski, or the other "top-tier" players are capable of choosing "absurd" templates? If any of them decide to play a rare template, I'll be interested. But it's obvious that everything will revolve around LM, Jeb, and G+U.

LuckyF

6 years ago

Auto-translated

I agree with Vanya, the Warlock option is more interesting.

In reply to osfaraon

Grando

6 years ago

Auto-translated

osfaraon

Why do you think that Enott, FTS, Bishop, Hellight, Lutski, or any of the other approved "daddies" are capable of choosing "absurd" templates?

I don't even know why we should think about this. I just assume that a person can act as they please. People abuse the +u rule, as discussed in another thread. Why? For the sake of rating. Why not abuse a "not a bug, but a feature" in the rules for the sake of rating and prizes? I don't see any obstacles.
Thank you for the answers. Everything is clear.

Jelen117

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Please register me for the tournament.

In reply to Jelen117

osfaraon

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Jelen117

Please register me for the tournament.

Welcome!

Added 1 minute ago

LuckyF

I agree with Vanya, the dark version is more interesting.

At least something appealed to SeriousSloth.
We'll keep the dark version.

Szopa666

6 years ago

Hey. I don't understand how this tournament could be competetive at this point (how many current top10 in lobby abusing fact g+u without rules (!) have broken gain?)
Remove me from tournament please.

FireToSky

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Okay, RaccAttack, I agree. Let's remove G+U from the pool or somehow limit it. P.S. I'm tired of losing rating there. Kappa

Ihromant

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Adding a rule that the top 3 players cannot play G+U might help. On one hand, it will be easier to get into the top 3, but on the other hand, it will be more difficult to stay there.

In reply to Szopa666

osfaraon

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Szopa666

Hey. I don't understand how this tournament could be competitive at this point (how many current top10 in the lobby are abusing the fact that G+U is allowed without rules (!) and have broken gains?)
Please remove me from the tournament.

+

Added 1 minute ago

FireToSky

Well, RaccAttack, I agree. Let's remove G+U from the pool or somehow limit it.
P.S. I'm tired of losing rating there Kappa.

Maybe it would be easier to remove the size dependency from the rating formula?

Added 38 seconds ago

Ihromant

Adding a rule that the top 3 cannot play G+U could definitely help. On the one hand, it will be easier to get into the top 3, on the other hand, it will not be so easy to stay there.

But how will I track this? Only based on trust.

Grando

6 years ago

Auto-translated

osfaraon

Wouldn't it be easier to remove the size dependency from the rating formula?

But how would we do that? Baratorch lives in a parallel world. It all depends on luck – if something drops from there, we'll enjoy it.

osfaraon

6 years ago

Auto-translated

ATTENTION!
Rule number 7 has been changed to reflect this possibility, as stated at the beginning of the tournament.
See the initial post.

In reply to osfaraon

Pridu

6 years ago

Auto-translated

osfaraon

ATTENTION!
Rule #7 has been changed to reflect this possibility, as stated at the beginning of the tournament.
See the initial post.

Players are taking advantage of the last opportunity )) and are gathering in the online lobby.

In reply to Pridu

osfaraon

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Pridu

Players are taking advantage of the last opportunity and hanging out in the online lobby.

I still don't fully understand why a perfectly ordinary template needs to be banned within the framework of a single tournament. It is available to everyone on equal terms. I did it because many players, whose opinions I respect, asked me to.

=Lizard=

6 years ago

Auto-translated

Honestly, the "tournament" is becoming completely absurd, and I agree with Chopa. Besides the fact that even the organizers don't seem to understand the harm this "perfectly ordinary template" is causing to the players, the lobby ladder is starting to turn into a total free-for-all. I already mentioned a player named Messiah in another thread, who has consistently been in the top 10 for a long time, but if you look at his stats, you'll see a completely inexplicable jump from 300 rating to 700 at some point (without playing any games). Now, a certain norbixu has appeared, with 70+ wins, 0 losses, and is in the top 2. No one knows who he is, but someone is apparently going to challenge him within this (non-)tournament! And I'm not even talking about Brabuss, Garrosh, etc. And everyone doesn't care; it seems Baratorchu doesn't care either. The end of the story.

In reply to =Lizard=

Pridu

6 years ago

Auto-translated

I'll reiterate: there was already an emo season, with the same heavy abuse of pts. Then a relatively even season, won by Zhopych. Now it's a season of G+U and Cloak of the Undead King, and then when Baratorch changes the rating point system again, there will be some other hero season. I don't see anything bad about this at all. These imbalanced G+U maps brought a bit of excitement to the hero lobby, when else will you fight with a hundred titans. p.s. Conservative heroes generally don't like to leave their comfort zone.

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from (none) - 2

Statistics

Library

Users Online 8 users 1346 guests

Today's Visitors 15