I don't know, 2400 azure seems like a decent goal, and I think it will be achievable in a couple of years.
Posts from HW tournament statistics analyzer.
Auto-translated
How do you create these images? Can someone explain it in simple terms?
Take a look; there are many images with numbers. There are also back and border images. This is about the drawing part. Next, you need to create images with text. The text is created using links that may stop working at any time, but for now, they work, and that's great. Example: http://chart.apis.google.com/chart?chs=120x30&cht=p3&chtt=hello&chts=FFFFFF,24&chf=bg,s,00000000
Then, take all the necessary images, overlay them on top of each other, and save the result in a publicly accessible folder on Google. Repeat this every 20 hours, as the operation is not very resource-efficient.
I think that's all.
Added 10 minutes ago
A player with a 2200 rating, winning against a 1800 rating, receives only 1 point, but loses 32 when losing. Winning/losing against a 2000 rating, respectively, +2 and -16.
Considering that the 2200-rated player doesn't have an equal opponent, they will have to consistently win at least 9 out of 10 games, and if they participate in Tournaments, they will have to maintain a pace of 30-40 consecutive wins – this is unrealistic.
ICQ:5676388
If superhumans appear in the future, or if the point system changes, then reaching 2300-2400 will be achievable. In reality, it would be good if at least one person has 2200 and maintains that level for at least some time. In my opinion, I would give a blue badge for a maximum of 2200.
It's not about superhumans, but about time. The more players with 1500 appear, the more people start reaching 1700 and so on. For comparison, in 2014, there were only a few players with 1900. And no one had 2000. Now there are already 2-3 people with 2000, as well as about 5-6 people with a rating of 1900+. I think in a couple of years, there will be several people with 2100 and a bunch with 2000+. This is the rating inflation.
Added 6 minutes later
By the way, what do you think about graphs? What other graphs would be cool to add?
ICQ:5676388
Instead of a graph, it would be good to have statistics (wins/losses) for games played with different castles (including the opponent's castles) and templates, presented in a table.
Wrap the image in (bracket)IMG][/IMG] in the signature.
ICQ:5676388


привет, можешь сменить подпись) 6лм - норм шабл, а джебус тупое говно. Я был тотально не прав. © =Lizard=
By the way, it would be nice...
horizontally - castle icons,
vertically - "win by" and "lose to" (numbers in the "lose to" row are red)
The second table:
horizontally - template names in text,
vertically - "wins" and "loses"
I understand that the person was writing about the lobby rating (which will hardly become representative in the next year or two anyway).
But we can also take this idea and apply it here. Add an alternative rating based only on Tournaments games.
For starters, just let people view it.
I created statistics on templates. The template names are clickable.
It's cool and informative statistics.
Added 56 seconds later
It would be great if someone collected beautiful pictures for the templates; they could be put in a column as well.
Added 13 minutes later
I also fixed the URL for inserting it into the signature. It turns out that last time it was messed up by the auto-renaming. I should have gone to bed yesterday :D
ICQ:5676388
How do you create these images? Can someone explain it in simple terms?
You need to remove the asterisks and replace NAME with your nickname in two places. You will get an image with your rating, and clicking on it will take you directly to the website.
I also fixed the URL for inserting it into the signature. It turns out that last time it was messed up by the auto-renaming. I should have gone to bed yesterday :D
Discord - Xocenk#2473
A new batch of improvements has been added to the rating:
1. Finally, the starting games that were previously in spreadsheets have been added.
Now, AlexTheGreat has reappeared in the top overall rankings.
2. The Tournament rating page is now working.
The idea is that this is the most competitive version of the rating, which only relies on tournaments (seasonal themes are not taken into account).
The second column on that page is the current season.
The third column is the 3 most recent completed seasons plus the current season (so currently, it's the period from 01.12.2016).
This is the first version, so we'll continue to monitor it.
3. The design of the page has been adjusted according to the templates.
The graphs have been tidied up – now they are all the same width.
4. Errors in the signature banners have been fixed.
In some places, the images of swamp and barbarian monsters were mixed up.
P.S. What does this have to do with technical support?
icq: 681350680
