Auto-translated
I don't know, 2400 azure seems like a decent goal, and I think it will be achievable in a couple of years.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
I don't know, 2400 azure seems like a decent goal, and I think it will be achievable in a couple of years.
How do you create these images? Can someone explain it in simple terms?
A player with a 2200 rating, winning against a 1800 rating, receives only 1 point, but loses 32 when losing. Winning/losing against a 2000 rating, respectively, +2 and -16.
Considering that the 2200-rated player doesn't have an equal opponent, they will have to consistently win at least 9 out of 10 games, and if they participate in Tournaments, they will have to maintain a pace of 30-40 consecutive wins – this is unrealistic.
If superhumans appear in the future, or if the point system changes, then reaching 2300-2400 will be achievable. In reality, it would be good if at least one person has 2200 and maintains that level for at least some time. In my opinion, I would give a blue badge for a maximum of 2200.
It's not about superhumans, but about time. The more players with 1500 appear, the more people start reaching 1700 and so on. For comparison, in 2014, there were only a few players with 1900. And no one had 2000. Now there are already 2-3 people with 2000, as well as about 5-6 people with a rating of 1900+. I think in a couple of years, there will be several people with 2100 and a bunch with 2000+. This is the rating inflation.
Instead of a graph, it would be good to have statistics (wins/losses) for games played with different castles (including the opponent's castles) and templates, presented in a table.


By the way, it would be nice...
How do you create these images? Can someone explain it in simple terms?
I also fixed the URL for inserting it into the signature. It turns out that last time it was messed up by the auto-renaming. I should have gone to bed yesterday :D