Ley
Auto-translated
In other words, your position looks like this:
"If, based on a detailed, step-by-step description of the battle provided by the player in his save file (before the battle), the reviewer cannot achieve the specified sequence of morale drops, the battle should be considered invalid."
Is that what you mean?
And how? - are we supposed to take his word for it? Let's conduct a poll - let's put it up for public consideration. Of course, your position is understandable - "not only will it be a pain to check the save, but also to select battles" - is that what you mean?
And how many times should the check be done to definitively state that the morale could not have dropped? Because that's what we're talking about. We are not evaluating the probabilities of morale dropping; we are discussing the mechanism for checking the save.
I'm not claiming that the morale drop should be checked in any particular way - yes, the question is about checking the save, but if the save includes the morale drop, what do you suggest?
[/U]If the verification method doesn't work even on one of the saves, then it is incorrect. And the number of units in the battle is irrelevant. The question is: can what has already happened always be repeated, and how many attempts are needed to guarantee that it was actually the case or not?
What does the phrase "verification method" mean?
It can be repeated, but after how many attempts...? - it's hard to answer.
"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."
