Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
Decency is a relative concept. For some, beating up gays is considered decent behavior.
For some people, at least. There are many people, and they all have their own opinions. American media once happily wrote about the "liquidation" of Gaddafi. That is, the murder of a person turns out to be a decent act for a not-so-small number of people, who, even from our point of view, cannot be called freaks... But these are just "points of view." Some of these points of view are worse, others are better; it is quite possible to determine the best of them, and no relativism is needed. Another question is that there are indeed insignificant things that do not really affect anything (for example, whether a woman wears a skirt or trousers is also acceptable). This is a kind of fashion, rules of etiquette, and so on, which for some reason is often confused with ethics, but in reality, there is nothing in common here.
As long as a person can accept the values of those around them and respects others' personal space, everything is fine; it doesn't matter what their values and interests are. But those who don't understand (or won't accept) this can safely be thrown into the Chernobyl reactor as useless biological waste.
I tried smoking when I was really drunk, and I got tired of most of my colleagues going for smoke breaks while I was left waiting like an idiot, so I joined them. I didn't get the point at all; you inhale and exhale smoke, and it's supposed to be incredibly interesting.
I once decided to join a smoking colleague on smoke breaks during my shift, and I did it several times a day for a year, not counting smoking cigarettes on weekends when meeting with friends. When he quit, there was no reason to go out anymore, and I stopped seeing cigarettes for weeks and months. What's my point? That the harm is exaggerated, and there's no addiction. Those who say they can't quit smoking are just kidding! Siverfale
Look, this is a website where 12-year-old kids create their own characters. Don't ask me how I got there.
Alex, what do you think about this kind of fidget spinner?
Well, there's nothing wrong with that, just like with nunchucks.
For example, vegans believe that from a moral point of view, it is absolutely unacceptable to eat meat. And Muslims believe that consuming alcohol is absolutely immoral. So, how should we deal with such statements? And what should we do with those who violate the morals of vegans and Muslims?
Vegans are constantly arguing with meat-eaters, and Muslims put those who like to drink in jail. And that's normal – to hate and ruin the lives of those who live against your beliefs.
Alex, I have an idea for you!
We won't have enough money.
E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza, e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
What am I getting at? That the harm is exaggerated, and there is no addiction.
Addiction is not the same as harm. It's a specific case. Yes, this particular harm is quite exaggerated; I know a million stories about people who simply forgot about cigarettes due to various life circumstances and eventually got rid of this habit altogether. But the main harm from smoking is the smoke in your lungs. It's like breathing in a forest fire every day; it doesn't bode well.
Twenty years pass: homosexuals kick heterosexuals and believers, and the government turns a blind eye to it.
Just as we have the moral right to kick them, they have the moral right to kick us. Simply because there are more of us and we are stronger, we are kicking them now. The ones with more numbers win, and that's also normal.
E si sui vius, er mi grans benananza, e si ieu muoir, er mi grans deliuriers
What am I getting at? That the harm is exaggerated, and there's no addiction.
From personal experience, I can say that there really is no addiction. Based on my older sister's experience, who after a week without cigarettes experienced terrible stress, felt unwell, and even started having suicidal thoughts, I can say that for some individuals, this thing does cause quite a strong addiction.
Added 1 minute later Alex thinks like a school kid, but I'm going to bed soon and don't want to argue with him about his views against minorities, but I hope someone convincing will show up.