Skip to content

Posts from The most useful monster. Auto-translated

4.5 (4 ratings)
In reply to Vlad
User Avatar
#319
Auto-translated
Xaker;102300
I think it's very problematic to definitively state which unit is better.
Because there isn't a single "best" unit; each one is useful in a specific situation.
Under certain conditions, for example, depending on the race your opponent is playing...
So, it's a matter of knowledge and experience...
We all know that without you! And it's obvious that it depends on the situation! You should rather vote for the most useful unit in your opinion! If you don't know how, I'll tell you: name 3 of the coolest units in your opinion, starting with the best. This will make you more interesting than repeating a phrase I've probably read five times in this thread, as well as many of its variations!
In reply to BASON
User Avatar
#320
Auto-translated
BASON;102322
Name 3 of the coolest units in your opinion, starting with the best. This will make you more interesting than repeating a phrase I've probably read five times in this thread, along with many of its variations!
That's the point... there aren't any that are "better"... Each one is good in a specific situation... Don't you agree?
And the phrase isn't memorized... it's self-generated...
С уважением, Vlad

HeroesWorld: В контакте
http://vk.com/heroesworld
User Avatar
#321
Auto-translated
We are not talking about the absolute best, but about the most useful units, and each player is free to justify why a particular unit is useful from their point of view. Therefore, the poll itself is very revealing, as it highlights the following:
1. How usefulness is expressed for a particular player.
2. Which units are leading in this regard.
3. There is an almost continuous discussion about one of the main units in the game - the army.
In reply to Vlad
User Avatar
#322
Auto-translated
Xaker;102330

That's the point... there aren't any that are better... Each one is good in a specific situation... Don't you agree?
And the phrase isn't memorized... it's self-generated.
No, I don't agree: because there are simply personal preferences! For example, some people might enjoy the stealth of thieves, while others prefer a djinn-illusionist. There's always something that a particular unit did that caught someone's attention, and now it's a staple in almost all tactics for playing as that faction.
In reply to BASON
User Avatar
#323
Auto-translated
BASON;102352
I disagree, even just because of personal preferences! For example, some people might enjoy the stealth of rogues, while others prefer a genie-illusionist. There's always something that a particular unit did that caught someone's attention, and now it's a staple in almost all tactics for playing as that faction.
It's one thing to find something amusing... But that doesn't mean it's useful...
If the discussion is about who is your favorite, and not just in general, then it's different for everyone... However, opinions vary here. :smile50:
С уважением, Vlad

HeroesWorld: В контакте
http://vk.com/heroesworld
In reply to Vlad
User Avatar
#324
Auto-translated
This doesn't make Vampires "weaklings"; they are the strongest enemy of level 3, but I personally prefer "Spitting Fiends" because ranged attacks are preferable.
I don't deny it. And in general, I apologize if I offended anyone. :smile39:

Gold Fenix, your messages are not very informative. The forum is not a place where everyone says thank you, please, sorry, I agree or disagree. A post should contain your point of view with arguments.
Sincerely, Pandora
In reply to Vlad
User Avatar
#325
Auto-translated
Xaker;102356

It's one thing to joke around... But that doesn't mean it's useful...
If the conversation is about who your favorite is specifically, and not in general, then it's different for everyone... However, everyone has different opinions here. :smile50:
Well, it's like water off a duck's back with you! It seems like no one needs you in the army: you'll build whatever you want...
In reply to BASON
User Avatar
#326
Auto-translated
BASON;102364
It seems like nothing affects you! Nobody seems to need you in the army: you build whatever you want...
On the contrary, I need everyone in the army... I try to build all the creatures so that I can use the maximum advantages of the faction.
С уважением, Vlad

HeroesWorld: В контакте
http://vk.com/heroesworld
User Avatar
#327
Auto-translated
On the contrary, I need everyone in my army... I try to build all creatures so that I can make the most of the race's advantages.
You can only build everyone if you have several Castles. Meaning, are you suggesting building one thing in one castle and another in a different one??? If you don't have a clear advantage in everything else, then it's a guaranteed loss.
And you can compare the usefulness of units; for example, a skeleton and an imp:
their strength per growth is roughly the same and small, but the imp travels far and gathers resources better; even in small numbers, they can cause significant trouble in battle by draining 1 mana from angels and cutting off their resurrection, and in large numbers with tactics... As for the skeleton—it's just a product of early Necromancer magic and mediocre fodder (although it's great for Sacrifice, but that's more exotic)/
And then there are units key to development, like vamps and djinns.
In reply to Fireball
User Avatar
#328
Auto-translated
Fireball;102388
You can only build all of them if you have several castles. So, are you suggesting building one in one castle and another in a different one? If you don't have a clear advantage in everything else, that's a sure way to lose.
And you can compare the usefulness of units, for example, a skeleton and an imp:
Their strength increases approximately the same amount and is small, but the imp runs far and collects resources better, and even in small numbers, it can cause a lot of trouble in battle by sucking 1 mana from angels and disrupting their resurrection, and in large numbers and with tactics... And a skeleton is just a product of early necromancy and mediocre meat (although it's great for Sacrifice, but that's already an exotic use).
And there are also key units for development, like vampires and djinn.
But of course, I don't build absolutely all of them... but most of them.

Regarding your example:
That's exactly the case where imps are better for gathering resources, and skeletons are good in large numbers (thankfully, necromancy is designed for that).
So, the choice of units depends on what you need... at the moment.
After all, you won't have to gather resources for the entire game...
С уважением, Vlad

HeroesWorld: В контакте
http://vk.com/heroesworld
User Avatar
#329
Auto-translated
But of course, I'm not building absolutely everything... but most of it.
You're just making things harder for yourself.
and skeletons are good in large numbers (thankfully, necromancy was created for that)
There won't be much fewer Imps. Necromancy is designed to raise vampires, or at least ghosts, and skeletons are just a short, intermediate stage. And it's sad to run around with them because of their low movement speed.
So the choice of units depends on what you need... at the moment.
But some units are needed in many situations, while others are just a temporary addition. Therefore, some are more useful than others.
In reply to Fireball
User Avatar
#330
Auto-translated
Fireball, I completely agree with you! A prime example of a universally good choice for a unit is the Djinn. They can help in any situation! Or, for example, no one in the poll even mentioned the Hydra, while the Black Dragon is in third place. There are still units that are versatile and suitable for any battle!
In reply to Fireball
User Avatar
#331
Auto-translated
Fireball;102400
You're only hurting yourself.

I'm not taking them all out at once... but gradually...
Fireball;102400

There won't be many fewer Imps. Necromancy is designed to raise Vampires, or at least Ghosts, and Skeletons are just a short, intermediate stage. And running around with them is not ideal for movement speed.
Yes, of course, skeletons are only good when there is no other choice or in the early stages.
Of course, I don't plan to run around with them throughout the entire game.
Fireball;102400

But some units are needed in many situations, while others are just a temporary addition. Therefore, some are more useful than others.
I think it's difficult to take into account all the existing criteria for the usefulness of creatures... because there are so many of them in the game, so I wouldn't judge with 100% certainty...

There is no defense against a hammer... unless you have another hammer... :smile25:
С уважением, Vlad

HeroesWorld: В контакте
http://vk.com/heroesworld
In reply to Vlad
User Avatar
#332
Auto-translated
Okay, I won’t waste my time arguing anymore: I’m stopping the debate with Xaker. There are units that are better than others, and that’s undeniable! Of course, each unit is good for its own situation, but that’s not an absolute rule.
In reply to BASON
User Avatar
#333
Auto-translated
BASON;102417
Alright, I won't waste my time arguing anymore: I'm stopping the debate with Xaker. There are units that are better than others, and that's undeniable! Of course, each one is good for its own situation, but that's not a hard and fast rule.
Are we even arguing? :D We're just sharing our knowledge and beliefs... :smile12:
Of course, everyone has their own priorities... but for different reasons...
С уважением, Vlad

HeroesWorld: В контакте
http://vk.com/heroesworld