Posts from Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

I hope we won't revisit this topic again.

Ah... naive... I know someone who I think would like to argue... :D

Okay, which rating should we use? Should we simply use the final blitz rating as an indicator of experience? This would be closer to the traditional rating calculation scheme.

The oscillator makes it clear. I'm just using the blitz results as "data" to inform our approach to existing tournaments. This will make everything simpler and clearer for those who haven't followed the lengthy discussions.

No, there's no need to confuse anyone...
In the first column, write "Blitz Rating".

Well, they will probably choose the best all-rounder... i.e., the one with the highest overall rating.

Therefore, we ask the organizers to clarify the situation.

Then which of them will be after 10 stages?

And what about the serious shortcomings of these rankings mentioned above? Perhaps the organizers should come up with a unified scoring system specifically for multi-stage Tournaments, one that would not have at least obvious contradictions?

I didn't understand the question.

So, either suggest your own option or support one of the existing ones.

Let me clarify. Which of the rankings will be used to determine the final distribution of places?

Okay, here’s a specific proposal. Combine the ratings from IronAxe and VDV Forever in a 1:1 ratio.
50 rating points are awarded according to the VDV Forever system.
50 rating points are awarded according to the IronAxe system (days * 50).
In this way, the requirements for differentiating participants with the same number of days and the additivity of stage results will be met. Moreover, such a system is easy to use and understand (rating for place + rating for days). The addition proposed by AlexeyPank for progress in a multi-stage tournament is not acceptable.

Comrade, are you sure you read the entire thread?

I have the impression that you didn't.

Firstly: tell me what the fundamental difference is between your system and the oscillator?

Secondly: all discussions about the rating should be held in the above-mentioned topic.

You confused me; is it not obvious? And the differences between the two are absolutely fundamental:
1. The linear part of the rating depends on the total number of participants N as (n-1)/(N-1). But in VDV Forever, the dependence is ONLY on the position occupied.
2. With a given number of participants (as a parameter), the linear rating decreases linearly, i.e., the difference between 1st and 2nd place is the same as between 11th and 12th, which is not good. In VDV Forever, the difference between 1st and 2nd will be greater than between 11th and 12th.

50 rating points are awarded according to the VDV Forever system.
50 rating points are awarded according to the IronAxe system (ratio of days * 50).