Player rating for tournaments across all installments of Heroes.

Auto-translated

Fireball;100362

You confused me; is it not obvious? And the differences between the two are absolutely fundamental:
1. The linear part of the rating depends on the total number of participants N as (n-1)/(N-1). But in VDV Forever, the dependence is ONLY on the position occupied.
2. With a given number of participants (as a parameter), the linear rating decreases linearly, i.e., the difference between 1st and 2nd place is the same as between 11th and 12th, which is not good. In VDV Forever, the difference between 1st and 2nd will be greater than between 11th and 12th.

I apologize, :smile43: I didn't immediately grasp the essence of the statement.

In essence:
The proposal is not without merit; that is a fact.
The idea of introducing a non-linear component into the linear part needs to be considered.
I don't quite like the fact that the numbers in this non-linear part (depending on the position) are taken arbitrarily...
But I like the idea itself.

Fireball;100327

50 rating points are awarded according to the VDV Forever system.
50 rating points are awarded according to the IronAxe system (ratio of days * 50).

Well, we can keep the 100-point system... the numbers in the third column won't change... ;)
It's just that the 100-point system is somehow more familiar...

Sincerely.