Skip to content

Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

4.3 (23 ratings)
Closed
What shall we name the establishment?
28 voters
Single choice Public votes
This poll is closed.
“Flooding.” Simple and effective
17.9% 5 votes
Leave it as is – “Fludnyak”
7.1% 2 votes
“A den of debauchery.” How original!
39.3% 11 votes
Brewery
17.9% 5 votes
Another option (specify in the subject line)
17.9% 5 votes
User Avatar
#62957
Auto-translated
Regarding the mechanics of Stellaris, while your two corvettes are blocking enemy planets, the enemy fleet will engage in a major battle with you (which it will win, as it won't be divided), after which it will occupy the capital and deploy its troops there, and then repeat the same process with all the other planets in turn. It won't even need to leave two corvettes at each planet after the fleet leaves the system.
But honestly, I don't quite understand what you're getting at. Ple-Sen wrote that players were exploiting blockades, and that's why warships were removed from them. And you started complaining and talking about cavalry with sabers. What's the connection? It doesn't make sense.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#62958
Auto-translated
which will win, since it wasn't divided
two corvettes
Seriously?..
after which it will occupy the capital and deploy its troops there, and then repeat the same with all the other planets in turn, and it won't even need to leave two corvettes at each planet after the fleet leaves the system.
Okay, so initially it needs to win in space to make this happen, right?
By the way, it's clearly more convenient to go through all the systems with the main fleet, destroying defenses, and leaving bombers on enemy planets (so they don't build spaceports), and then seriously start occupying them. Or, you can deal with the occupation in parallel, because points for blocking planets are no longer awarded, and you'll have to do it sooner or later, unfortunately.
But in general, I don't quite understand what you're talking about. Ple-Sen wrote to you - players were exploiting blockades, and that's why Warscour was removed from them. And you started complaining and writing about cavalry with sabers. What's the connection? I don't get it.
Well, I wrote about it in the previous paragraph. And your tactic doesn't contradict that. Occupying planets is a serious matter, but after achieving victory in space, it becomes inevitable, so it's not necessary to wait for it to happen. That's all. But we are forced to deal with this mechanic and wait, because you can't score 100 points just for destroying a fleet, blockades don't give you points, so in short, wars are artificially prolonged by a not-so-useful mechanic.
Another question is, if you're a clever strategist and managed to bring in troops and conquer a planet using partisan methods, avoiding the enemy fleet, then yes, that's a significant victory. But this scenario seems unlikely to me, and the opponent can also take it back with their own troops, dominating in space, right?
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#62959
Auto-translated
But we are forced to deal with this mechanic.
So, were your words caused only by this? Because I explained the gameplay reasons for the Ple-Sen change to you right away.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#62960
Auto-translated
Of course. Although, it should be noted that with a normal AI, such a measure as removing points for blockading planets would be unnecessary, I believe. I personally exploited this in the sense that the AI couldn't split its fleet and lift the blockade, but instead threw its entire army at my two corvettes. Then the corvettes would fly to a safe distance, the enemy fleet would fly to pursue my main fleet, and I would bring the corvettes back... Well, you get the idea. If the enemy could simply separate its corvettes from the fleet (and, as I understand it, it can now), then it would no longer be possible to exploit this so brazenly, regardless of the points. Although, perhaps some loopholes still remain, I don't know.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#62961
Auto-translated
You should have just said it right away that you find it difficult to understand the mechanics of the armies, instead of coming up with some absurd comparisons.
Where do we go?
Where do we end up when we save the world?
User Avatar
#62962
Auto-translated
It’s a shame you can’t just blow up unnecessary planets; it would save so much time.

Whatever
User Avatar
#62963
Auto-translated
Oh, so now we have an end-game crisis! In reality, they promised something like that would happen "sometime later."
User Avatar
#62964
Auto-translated
Couldn't resist sharing, here's a small spoiler – the work is in progress, and sometimes it turns out quite amusing.

А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#62967
Auto-translated
Your games are awesome.

Added after 19 minutes
I still have a copy of Gul'dan's staff, by the way. Who knows, maybe my kids will see it.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения!
И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день



User Avatar
#62969
Auto-translated

I should buy a bakery and then get an eye fissure.
User Avatar
#62971
Auto-translated
Yesterday, I was watching another new installment, and I wondered – what will the developers surprise me with today? When they introduced the “quota of the day” in the form of a female dwarf working in a responsible position in a chemistry lab and cleaning up the mess that a careless white man created, I thought that social justice warriors had finally found a way to influence me, but fortunately, she didn’t accomplish anything significant in the series; the old man did everything, and she was given a couple of extremely strange “character-revealing” lines, accompanied by raised fists and a shout of “yay” after an encouraging speech from the doctor, which looked super-awful. It was like a scene from a kindergarten or a center for the incurably mentally ill named after Biovirenko. Remembering the terrible previous season, I am starting to lean towards the banal thought that they are not being too subtle, and a person cannot seriously express their liberal views in such a way, because it is obvious that it is an exaggerated

Moderated: PROFANITY in the message

mess
.
My sword, my trusted ally, unphased by my aspect.