Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Sacred Haven of DebaucheryAuto-translated
One of the ways to excuse oneself, as I already wrote, is to consider everyone around you to be unworthy and uninteresting people, with no topics worth discussing.
Vasey from the village of "Maliye Kui"
Well, now we know exactly where in the Perm region Vissy lives.
I was supposed to work on history and English today, but I didn't get anything done, so I'll have to do it tomorrow. My friends are inviting me to play billiards, but I really need to go and work on it. I need to come up with an excuse, any suggestions?
Небо – мольбы не ждёт Небо – угроз не слышит Небо – ведёт особый счёт Небо – тебя найдёт
One of the ways to excuse oneself, as I already wrote, is to consider everyone around as unworthy rabble with no interesting topics for conversation.
An interesting excuse for the unworthy rabble! Well, it's true – if I'm not interested in their vulgar topics and their conversations disgust me, then why should I be talkative with this crowd?
Tomorrow holds no promises Except the ones we've made
Why should I? Did I say I should? If you are aware of and accept your place as a dull, empty person in society, then you shouldn't. Other people somehow manage to live and communicate happily. Is an open-minded person necessarily obnoxious?
It's remarkable how quickly you rush to express contempt for people you've labeled yourselves, accusing them of having simplistic conversations. What can you talk about? What can you, Archie, talk about? Your crappy punk bands. Anything else? Elves? The philosophical musings of a tenth-grader, which everyone has already discussed in tenth grade while secretly drinking a bottle of Siberian Crown Lime on a pipe? Am I missing something? You don't read books, you're not interested in anything. Your repertoire of main conversation topics is limited to those same three: music, feelings, and idealism. If you ever did get interested in something, it never went beyond vague ideas like "it would be cool," which you'd abandon after a week. But there were always plenty of excuses for inaction.
Vissy? You're definitely a more vague personality, but I'll allow myself to make a guess. A D&D rulebook mixed with Salvatore's trash? Yes, a pseudo-schoolboy, sarcastic tone. You're so shrouded in mystery that I'll admit my imperfect mind can't offer much more, and I'm sure there's more to it.
And Wolf? One and a half anime titles watched? Another load of nonsense about cookies? What else? How I spent my summer?
In general, guys, don't try to be more than you are.
I anticipate something like, "You idiot, you don't know me at all, I don't reveal my innermost thoughts on this forum, I'm a much more complex person!"
Now is the perfect time to post a test to determine one's psychotype.
Tests aren't really necessary. They usually don't show the correct result. One test called me both a Huxley and a Balzac. But I'm actually a Hamlet, a hysterical (though rarely, and not online, thank goodness) poser who loves attention.
Morni, should we go through the rest? They might get offended.
Now is the perfect time to share a personality test.
Oh, lol. I was just talking to Lizardu. I'm too lazy to rewrite everything, so here's the text.
I generally enjoy taking tests. It's almost like Arandor; I also sometimes like to answer questions about myself, which is logical on one hand, but illogical on the other. You know what the catch is? The thing is, very often, tests don't have an answer that I could choose. <...> Even when necessary, I find it difficult to tell someone something unpleasant – unless they really annoy me. I can calmly tell someone everything I think about them.
This is a typical example of answer options, none of which I would choose. 19:38:52 I went straight to question 20. It just depends on the person, my mood at that moment, what I think about the person, and so on. There are so many factors. Every case is unique. > I love communication. > I'm not against communication, of course.
This is just ridiculous. And where is the MAIN answer option?)) Therefore, the test was passed terribly, because it couldn't be otherwise. This is what I don't like about tests. Almost every question is like that, where I can't answer with the given options. It's better to have tests where you write your own answer instead of choosing one, and then a real person checks it. I even get mutually exclusive answer options here. I mean, one time I choose one thing, and then the opposite of that.
So, I took some kind of socionics test, and it gave me complete nonsense. It was almost the opposite of my personality. They wrote fifteen paragraphs, and none of it was about me.
What can you talk about?
About topics that interest us. Why would we talk about topics that don't interest us?
Happy Life
Ple-Sen
