Auto-translated
Yeah. And here, it's often better not to rush ahead at all!
celt
Posts from Impressions of Heroes V, for those who have played it.
Varg-Nar
Auto-translated
Yes! Although some consider the battlefield to be a bit small, limiting movement. But for me, it's just right. During a castle siege, the battlefield expands even further, allowing you to fully utilize the "Heroic Soul" ability. :)
***JOKER***
Auto-translated
The battlefields are quite good... I actually like them more than even in my favorite Heroes of Might and Magic 3.
Ёжик в тумане
Auto-translated
The battlefield is of normal size, but a slight increase in width and length, along with additional obstacles, would make the battle more interesting.
***JOKER***
Auto-translated
The battlefield is of a normal size, but a slight increase in width and length, plus additional obstacles, would make the battle more interesting.
Ёжик в тумане
Auto-translated
I never use the automatic troop deployment feature.
***JOKER***
Auto-translated
I never use automatic troop deployment.
Varg-Nar
Auto-translated
The automatic troop placement is not very good. I always position the troops myself, and even when attacking the next target, the troops remain in the positions where you placed them in the previous battle. If you want to change it, please do, but otherwise, it's very convenient.
Vlad
Auto-translated
I never use the automatic troop deployment feature.
And I also don't use the autobattle feature... I always do everything myself.
***JOKER***
Auto-translated
And rightly so... I don't use it myself either... it's always better to set things up manually than to rely on the computer.
And I also don't use autobattle... I always do everything myself.
fanat
Auto-translated
I use autobattle quite often. Otherwise, I get tired of players who show off; you attack them, and they have no one to fight with, but they still – FIGHT. So, to save time, autobattle is very useful.
Ёжик в тумане
Auto-translated
Autobattle is a very convenient feature, although sometimes the computer glitches and makes unjustified losses, and sometimes you realize that it is smarter than you:D. The biggest problem with the computer is that it doesn't know how to use magic correctly (this is especially noticeable with Dark Elves); instead of hitting with a meteor shower over a large area, it casts, for example, haste:mad:!
Varg-Nar
Auto-translated
I agree, autobattle is a great feature; it saves time. :) You attack, you look at the losses, and if you're not happy with them, you play manually. If there are no losses, that's great, and you continue. The AI doesn't really use magic very well, though. ;) The only problem with autobattle and mages is that you don't know if you'll do better or worse, but I always try, and sometimes it works out great, but never worse.
AlexeyPank
Auto-translated
I also like this combat system – first, it’s automatic, and then you can take control. It’s convenient, especially when replaying a map from a certain day.
Vlad
Auto-translated
I use autobattle quite often. Otherwise, I get tired of those show-offs; you attack them, and they have no one to fight with, but they still keep fighting. So, to save time, autobattle is very useful.
Statistics
Welcome our newest member:
recijeb