Posts from Will there be a sequel?

Preface. I've been looking at this section for a long time and wondering why there's only one topic. I decided to add to it.

Let's discuss:
1. Is it possible to continue the Heroes Chronicles?
2. Did the creators have such an idea, and what was it?
3. Would you like to play new Chronicles?
4. What is your vision for new sequels, what could the plot be?
5. In general, what do you think about all of this?

Postscript. My answers are that I am all for continuing and would like to play it. I don't know about the creators' plans. New Chronicles could be about the same Tarnum, but on the other hand, introducing new heroes would be good.

P.S.: What is the connection between the Chronicles and Might and Magic?

The idea is interesting, especially if you come up with a reasonable new plot and focus on a different hero, perhaps a new one. That could result in a very interesting game. However, it should naturally be set earlier in time than the Chronicles of Tarnum.

And how did the chronicles of Tarnum fit into the timeline? And which hero, for example, lived earlier? I'm not very familiar with the history.

Well, I don't know how they fit into the timeline, but the point is that the last chronicle ends with the destruction of the world, so it needs to be done earlier. I don't know which hero lived earlier; I think we can just look at the sequence of campaigns.

The chronicles cover a very large period, even before the events of part 2, or perhaps even earlier. XEL described everything in detail in the Chronology thread. I also thought about it. If you decide to do something, I will participate in creating the chronicles. It's easier for me to create maps for the 3rd game than for the 4th. The only problem is that we need to come up with a plot.

1. Maybe, but not from Ubisoft. 2. There was an idea to create something similar for Heroes 4, but in a slightly different style. Two add-ons were released for Heroes 4, but there was no game based on the Chronicles system. 3. If it is high quality and does not contradict the lore, then yes. 4. If the Chronicles are for the fourth Heroes, then learn more about the history of Axeoth (as long as it doesn't deviate from what is already known), if for the third - about the history of Enroth, Antagarich, Jadama, etc. You can have both. 5. Currently, there is a very good and promising project for the fifth Heroes - Legends of the Ancients, which is a continuation of the previous universe, set in the world of Heroes 4 - Axeoth. Perhaps this is what could be considered "new Chronicles." http://lota.celestialheavens.com/ Regarding the connection with Might and Magic: /topic/3323/ The last Chronicle does not end with the destruction of the world; there is still at least a couple of months of gameplay left. Executor, before the Chronicles about Tarnum? After all, you don't like science fiction.

1. Is a continuation of the Heroes Chronicles possible?
A continuation... is it possible?

If there's enough desire, it's possible; the main thing would be to have the will to implement it.

So, I think it's quite possible.

What if we created another campaign like Tarnum's, but with the timeframe spanning the stories of four heroes? I believe that the Chronicles are a truly unique expansion to Heroes 3, and as a result, since the Heroes series continued after The Shadow of Death, there should also be a continuation of the Chronicles. In the same style, with an original plot and many other elements that are unique to the Chronicles. In my opinion, continuing this series would be great, without deviating from the established traditions of all the Chronicles installments.

XEL, you know more about the world's history and chronology than I do, so explain how science fiction fits into this. And by the way, if there are only a couple of months between the end of the last Chronicle and the apocalypse, that's not enough for a decent campaign. I'm not just talking about in-game time, but also in reality, no campaign can be conducted in just two months.

That’s why I mentioned the fourth game, because it wouldn’t be very good to deviate from the Might and Magic lore. It’s much easier to revive the immortal Tarnum (if he even died; Sandro survived:smile02:). Than to come up with something that doesn’t exist in the lore, IMHO! Although, it seems that we will have to invent something new in the story of the fourth game. But in any case, it’s not up to us to decide, I think. We can just sit down, tinker around, and create a campaign, but fans like Hel probably wouldn’t like it:confused:

1. Perhaps
2. The idea was to extend the enjoyment of a beloved game for its dedicated fans.
3. I would like to, but I haven't even played the old ones (I also want to, but when I look in stores, I only see the first two parts, and I would like to have them all).
4. Tarnum remained immortal in Heroes 4; he was Verzhak's teacher, a hero in the campaign for Stronghold. At the end of the campaign, he leaves Verzhak to lead the newly created state, and he goes off to seek his own destiny.
5. I have nothing against Ashan; I play Heroes 5 and enjoy following the storyline (even if it's predictable). I hope they bring everything back officially to the old Might and Magic, and not just at the level of amateur mods (the same Legends of the Ancients could be officially released as Chronicles to appease the fans of the old Might and Magic – a good solution, by the way).

I don't mind Ashan either, quite the opposite, but I didn't understand something: there was mention of someone named Sandro – is that a coincidence? Does anyone know?

XEL, you know more about the world's history and chronology than I do, so explain what science fiction has to do with it?

Science fiction has always been a part of the Heroes universe. Before the Silence (see the chronology), there was science fiction.

Added 2 minutes later

I also have nothing against Ashan, quite the opposite, but I just didn't understand: there was mention of some Sandro - is it a coincidence? Does anyone know?

It's just that Ubisoft wanted to show off and claim that "here's at least some connection to the past." The same goes for Crag Hack and Solmyr.

Added 1 minute later
There's no point in criticizing LotA; it's better to enjoy it. Ubisoft is unlikely to revive the old universe because it required thinking to create the plot, and in Ashan, there's no need for that.

So, I think the whole mess with the Ice Blade started after the Silence expansion, right? That means there's a gap where we can fit it in.

The idea of continuing the chronicles with our own efforts is excellent! It should, of course (I hope no one will argue), be based on the third installment of Heroes of Might and Magic. The time period should be the era of Tarnum, but not about him. Why? Ubisoft worked on Tarnum; we are not them. HEL, as an expert on the history of Might and Magic, do you know of a hero, perhaps a minor one, who always appeared behind the main character, in a supporting role? Regarding the statement that "fans, such as HEL, probably won't like it," I say that it will be liked if HEL helps with the story. Will you help? And finally, in this post (but not in life): who is in favor?