Posts from Silver Persimmon

16

MAN - doesn't seem like it. The video presents a composite image of a person, and shows that he is scum. And that he will be punished by an even stronger scum. I don't want to argue with the message of this video, but I'm sure that HeroesWorld members don't consider the GM to be scum. In this case, I am deliberately speaking for everyone. Kosh, correct me if you disagree with me.
So roughly 4/10, the idea is fundamentally wrong.
When you eat poisonous meat - Ah, is this some meme about fruit? I recall it. 8/10.
We're Gonna Finally Be Fine! - Community - This is something personal. The feelings of a specific HeroesWorld member. Well, maybe. Who am I to judge what's going on in someone's head? 7/10
Skyrim Intro - I didn't get the idea. Possibly because I haven't played Skyrim. Is it about HeroesWorld being some kind of place where outcasts of society end up? Well... there's a nice legend like that. Okay, let's assume. It fits the forum atmosphere, 8/10.
Gypsy girl! - Do people really talk like that in our forum games? Nonsense. Only Nebo used to swear before, and Kosh would clean up after him. Then Nebo became a coordinator, settled down, got married. 3/10
DnD when you're over 30 - I believe it. Now it's relevant. 8/10
You left our philosophical gathering - Overall yes, quite accurate. Loudly, pompously, and without proof, rambling on about women. The "accused's" reaction is actually a bit different here, but it's just a video association, not a verbatim adaptation. The essence is conveyed correctly, 8/10.

but I'm sure that HeroesWorld folks don't consider GM scum

If only you knew...

Gromyka - well... I just didn't like the song. + I don't quite agree. 4
MAN - did you recognize it? Do you agree? 4
When you eat poisonous meat - 9, there's a high degree of correspondence here, + it really happened.
Community - ☁️
Skyrim intro - 5, when I went to Scotland with Nebk, I didn't play.
Gypsy girl! - 6, I was expecting the board to fly onto the floor or onto someone's head. The video didn't live up to expectations. I don't really agree; something like that only happened in "couch adventures."
DnD when you're over 30 - 7, it's quite possible, but it hasn't happened yet.
You left our philosophical hangout - 8, if he leaves the forum, then I'll give it a 10, but for now, it's like this.

1. 3 Well, he's dead and gone, what's the point of complaining? 2. 5 I don't quite understand. 3. 6 Was there something like that? 4. 5 Yes, man, that's exactly how it will be. 5. 5 What kind of place is that? 6. 3 Maybe it's time to stop doing such nonsense? 7. 4 It used to be funny to watch this video, but now it's sad. Both that the guy lost his boyfriend, and that he's having a tantrum in the street, and it's embarrassing to be near him.

+this really happened

Is this when our Tiara gang devoured the poisoned people from the Misty Clan? Or did the Carneol gang eat the poisoned children? This remark opens up some new levels of understanding of expeditions.

Do people really talk like that in our forum games?

The main thing is that everyone left with a smile on their face.

MAN - doesn't look like it. The video presents a generalized image of a person and shows that he is scum. And that a stronger scum will punish him. I don't want to argue with the message of this video, but I'm sure that HeroesWorld players don't consider GM to be scum. In this case, I'm deliberately speaking for everyone. Kosha, correct me if you disagree with me..

I didn't quite understand, please explain what you mean and what does that have to do with me?

found a video for the contest, although it doesn't fit the time limit. (

I didn't quite understand. Please explain what you mean and why you're bringing me into this.

You accused me of speaking for everyone. In this case, I intentionally spoke for everyone and emphasized it.

I don't understand. Why deliberately speak for everyone? Why emphasize it? Why ask me to correct you? Why do all of this after I said that I'm not comfortable with it? What are you trying to convey?

You’re still a tough old man – 7, it was unexpected to see Gromiko here. He’s good, he fits the context – quite well. But I like his story about Artem, who spreads through airborne droplets, even more.
MAN – 2, honestly, the narrative about how bad humanity is is starting to annoy me. Well, let’s go back to the stone caves, shit in the forest, and hunt animals with spears. It’s neither funny nor pleasant to watch. And I don’t perceive GMs as such villains either. So, for me, it’s a miss on all fronts.
When you eat poisonous meat – 10, hello, little fruits.
We’re Gonna Finally Be Fine! – 5, I haven’t played the academy-themed expansions, so it’s hard to evaluate.
Skyrim – 5, I don’t have strong associations between this expansion and the start of custom games. Maybe I haven’t played the right expansion.
Two old men are playing backgammon! – 6, but it’s true that the aftertaste of some games is exactly like that. It’s relatable, but the video itself has some kind of repulsive, unpleasant vibe.
You abandoned our philosophical life for women – 2, Nebok didn’t trade us for Altushek. He’s still with us and continues to combine the pleasant with the useful. The video itself is surprisingly more unpleasant than the previous one

continues to combine pleasure with usefulness.

😠

I don't understand. Why deliberately speak for everyone? Why emphasize? Why ask me to correct you? Why do all of this after my words about how I don't like it? What are you trying to convey?

In all 15 years, I haven't written a single post with the intention of upsetting you. Accept this as an axiom.

I write what I think is necessary. Knowing that you like to nitpick on this topic, I made a special note for you so that there would be nothing to criticize.
But here's the problem, you still have some complaints.
Can you not take everything personally? That someone is trying to offend you, etc. This has been happening for years, you even wrote something similar to me on Skype.

That’s why I asked you directly what you meant, because I wasn’t sure if you were deliberately trying to provoke me or if you just have trouble expressing yourself. Without any hidden meanings or ulterior motives, I genuinely didn’t understand what was going on and why you wrote it that way. You’ve now answered, and I understand that it was simply a misunderstanding, and you didn’t realize how your specific remarks would be perceived from my perspective. I’m giving you feedback: they come across as frankly bad and awkward, and the message is completely misinterpreted. It’s better to just leave them out than to do it like that. I’m sad that I couldn’t convey my message to you back then and explain exactly what I didn’t like about your words, but oh well.
I don’t put hidden meanings into my messages, and you don’t need to look for any subtext; a cigar is just a cigar. If I write, “Please explain what you meant, I don’t understand,” that’s exactly what I mean, and not “Oh no, I’m being offended again.”