Skip to content

Posts from Shadowverse

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#6615
Auto-translated
I wasn't aiming for the A Grand Prix, but I passed the B one easily on the first try. Mystery is quite common in both formats, but I just can't seem to make it work; it always messes up my mulligan. As for the Forest, I only see it in rotation when I pick it myself. I haven't seen Haven in the Grand Prix at all, even though I crafted a couple of Lions. And calling Lily strong is laughable – it's a much worse Elven Song, and it only plays because the song itself hasn't been rotated out yet. Gilneaz is decent. Maybe remove the Ambush or reduce its stats so it can be killed more easily from under the Ambush. But overall, it's not broken, and it needs a prepared board, unlike the Balanslord. ^I pulled three Gileks in the first few days of the expansion (I don't remember crafting them) and I'm putting them in every deck.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
In reply to Драккошка
User Avatar
#6616
Auto-translated
Well, the beauty and the problem with this mystery card lie in its versatility. It has the potential to clutter the board like Daria, the potential to deal direct damage like the old Burn Rune, and the potential to control the board for a long time and then OTK, like Chimera/Dishift. It's kind of a quintessence of all rune gameplay, which is probably why I enjoy playing it.
But the problem is that each of these potentials, taken individually, is worse than in the old rune decks. That is, in theory, you can beat anyone, but if you don't draw the right cards (board clears and Calio's against aggro, Magic Founder and direct damage when you need to kill before turn 10, Anya if you have to play a long game), you're doomed.

You might be right about Lily, and when Song rotates out, everything will be fine (or the Forest class will become completely unplayable). I just encounter it quite often, and it didn't seem any worse than Shadow. But Gylneliz – yes, she should have her Ambush ability removed. Like, she comes out onto some weak board, deals damage to your face, and just stands there, and against some decks, you can't do anything about it. And on the next turn, a second one lands on top (which you definitely have, or draw from Lyria), and you take another guaranteed 5 damage, or even more.
I'm too f*cking old
To sell my soul
User Avatar
#6617
Auto-translated


Just saying, I'll leave this here.
I wonder if people will become interested in Revnue again if Bloodcraft gets a Rosie 2.0.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#6619
Auto-translated
At least it's still okay to collect wives. But not husbands. There's still no news about Azazel.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#6621
Auto-translated
I like how they censor things. Without censorship, most of the artwork would be outright vulgar.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#6623
Auto-translated
If censorship is necessary, it means the cards are vulgar in any case. But in general, Lock is right when he says that it's not very wise to collect cards just because of the artwork. It's important that the collection you're building is valued for something else, in this case, for its gameplay. And for a game whose gameplay you're tired of, no card will be able to please you in that regard. So, it's better to post them in a "beauty" section and leave it at that.
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#6624
Auto-translated
If censorship is necessary, then they are vulgar in any case.
If execution is necessary, then they deserved it in any case.
Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария
User Avatar
#6625
Auto-translated
I actually like how they censor things. Without censorship, a large portion of the artwork would be outright vulgar.
I don't like it; the difference between the first and second versions is usually minimal. The changes are equivalent to changing the hair color by a couple of shades. It's a completely incomprehensible and pointless action. Censorship should be done properly, not like this.
User Avatar
#6626
Auto-translated
If you have to execute someone, it means they deserved it in the first place.
More like, "if you have to execute someone, it means the state is in trouble."
 

К А
Стикеры GBF в Telegram
User Avatar
#6627
Auto-translated
...more politics again...
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
In reply to Драккошка
User Avatar
#6628
Auto-translated
`
Drakkoska
As I said on Skype, I find it interesting, but I don't like online games, so I'm still thinking about it.
Morning
Think about it. It could change your whole life.
Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - ЭмилияСтэфания - Амвросий - ЛестерАльсираАлария
In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl
User Avatar
#6629
Auto-translated
We had 2 gacha leaders, 75 legendary cards, 5 meta decks, a bucketful of vials, and a whole bunch of memes of all sorts and colors, technical cards, as well as wards, healing, OTK combinations, a bit of unplayable garbage, and 2 dozen ways to crush an opponent. It wasn't exactly a necessary supply for taking grandmaster, but once you start collecting, it becomes hard to stop. The only thing that worried me was stealing cards from the opponent's class. Nothing in the world is more helpless, irresponsible, and vile than decks based on stealing. I knew that sooner or later, we would switch to this trash.


Added 18 hours 49 minutes ago
Maybe someone wants to duel in "Give Two: All-Stars" and get a grand prize ticket? I'll be available around 7 PM.
I'm too f*cking old
To sell my soul