Skip to content

Posts from Shadowverse

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
User Avatar
#3175
Auto-translated
5 points, ward.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3176
Auto-translated
Peasants with a ban – that’s rough.
Peasants are generally great in card games. For example, in Talisman.
User Avatar
#3177
Pleasant Mob
User Avatar
#3178
Auto-translated
Peasants are generally awesome in card games.
Meanwhile, in strategy games.



А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3179
Auto-translated






Forest: well, as I said, it's a bit meh. For tempo maybe it's okay; they use them and Cybelka with the wind god to chase others. It might even work because of zero-cost fairies and other removals - for example, on round 6, an amulet is down, May, zero-fairy, Tia, that would be a decent setup, oh right, Themis and revelation, what a predicament.
Oh right, in the picture - those are the Bremen Town Musicians, 146% certain.

Shadow and Heaven: as a concept - very interesting. But in reality, I predict Shadow will get another ridiculously OP card with AoE and free evolve, while Heaven gets yet another 6-drop that's still worse than Jeanne, Garuda, the Judge, the Valhalla guy, Almirajka, Themis, etc., etc. Unless it works in near-Elan builds or as a pseudo-ward for control.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3180
Auto-translated
Oh yes, on Reddit, they are joking about Albert's grandfather and grandmother and are urging Kotov to deal with this problem.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3181
Auto-translated
I read the text for the forest map more carefully, and it actually looks better now. But it's still only suitable for a tempo-based Sylvan deck.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3182
Auto-translated
Dungeon is much more appealing than Haven...
User Avatar
#3183
Auto-translated
Well, not *much* better, but it's improved in terms of both effect and art.

And I'm waiting for the husbands.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3184
Auto-translated
No, actually, there are quite a few.
User Avatar
#3185
Auto-translated
In terms of effect, yes, but regarding the art style, I'm not a fan of foot fetishism.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3186
Auto-translated
I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that the focus of this drawing isn't on the feet.
User Avatar
#3187
Auto-translated
I'm not a fan of foot fetishism.
And I don't like how the white one looks; the dress sits awkwardly, she looks like an old woman wearing a tea cozy.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
User Avatar
#3188
Auto-translated
Dude, I actually have a foot fetish, but there's really no emphasis on feet in the art. Just Google it to see the difference.
User Avatar
#3189
Auto-translated
Okay, fine, she’s just not to my taste, and I’m already nitpicking about her legs.
А, вот почему.

🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕