Actaea — Expedition — HeroesWorld

Ment

11 years ago

Auto-translated

The full version, NS is no longer taken into account, the GM is accused of manipulating the results, of poorly distributing the properties of indicators, players argue with each other about their political decisions even more than if they were discussing real politics.

The light version. A small add-on, the ability to supplement your country as desired, new scope for diplomatic negotiations. We play as before, NS is the basis, and technologies and other things do not add bonuses to indicators (exceptions: in the case of holding future games of the type of olympiads, mini-expeditions, etc.).

You wrote it in such a way that people are bound to choose the last option. )
Let me say this, I am happy with both options that I quoted. I will not choose between them, but I will not abstain, but rather give half a vote to each of them.

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

kcfgogbfalgfl

11 years ago

Auto-translated

I won't choose between them, but I won't refrain either,

It seems that political debates in Actae are teaching players something.

In reply to Arandor

MedjersoN_HP

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Arandor

And the biased attitude will always remain.
They didn't want to make an agreement with me because I was listed as a dictator, but when Medj became their leader, no one broke the agreements with him.

What kind of complaints are these? :eek:

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Ment

11 years ago

Auto-translated

What kind of complaints are these?

These aren't complaints, he's just grumbling.

It seems that the political debates in Actae are teaching players something.

)))

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

kcfgogbfalgfl

11 years ago

Auto-translated

In short, I apologize, but I'm "not ready to accept the game mechanics (or rather, the parameters) that Reven has prepared."

Well, then, a lighter version is all that remains.

You can play as Greywater in this project if you want.

I don't know how best to explain my attitude towards this... Let's just say I obviously enjoy spending my free time at the computer. I read something there, do something, listen to music, watch something occasionally, and so on. But if I find myself somewhere far from my computer, I won't touch someone else's, even if I don't have anything else to do. But not out of squeamishness, God forbid, but simply because it won't have the materials I need for a pleasant pastime. And even in games like Civilization, I rarely choose anyone other than my favorites (only occasionally as an exception for a specific game).

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Arandor

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Perhaps we can keep the third option, and as for the expeditions and ideas for them, these can be coordinated with the creators of the country. Since the setting is closest to 1257, the expansion will likely be similar, i.e., a squad, quests, and so on. So, these quests can be devised by the players themselves before the expansion begins; rather, they create a specific problem in their country, and the GM formalizes it as a quest. This way, there will be an opportunity to visit each country that offers a quest, but at the same time, the country's owner will be aware of the possible consequences, and so on. This is to ensure that we don't suddenly have to fly north to Agara to raid some warehouses and subsequently destroy the matriarchy there.

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

kcfgogbfalgfl

11 years ago

Auto-translated

The setting is actually closer to the year 1257.

No, it's not closer! It features much more futuristic technology.

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Ple-Sen

11 years ago

Auto-translated

This is so we don't suddenly have to fly north to Agara to raid some warehouses and subsequently destroy the matriarchy there.

First, Medja tries to deflect, now it's my turn, lol. I believe in equality, actually.

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Arandor

11 years ago

Auto-translated

this is just an example reference.

kcfgogbfalgfl

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Hero, you scared me with your tax increase in the issue chain, and I expected very radical changes in them. So far, I've responded to five (there's a sixth one pending), and I only got +10 to defense forces. I also lost 50 pacifism and ended up with a large negative value for compassion and similar things.

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Arandor

11 years ago

Auto-translated

No, it's not close! The technology there is much more futuristic.

Illumia is very close to them. you can go there to gain experience

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Ple-Sen

11 years ago

Auto-translated

It would make more sense to compare it to Ahassan, with the caveat that Ahassan has deserts and a patriarchal society. I have revealed your sinister plan.

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Ment

11 years ago

Auto-translated

It would make more sense if you compared it to Ahassan, with the caveat that Ahassan has deserts and a patriarchal society. I've uncovered your sinister plan.

Did Alex write this? What if he has a matriarchal society, dating back to prehistoric times? )

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Ple-Sen

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Did Alex write that? Maybe he has a matriarchy, dating back to prehistoric times?

The biography of his character clearly shows that he has a patriarchy, Mент. Although, I came up with the desert idea myself.

In reply to kcfgogbfalgfl

Heroist

11 years ago

Auto-translated

but I don't see any guarantees that the game will be balanced.

Balance for newbies isn't needed. Whoever builds more rockets is the king and champion, just like in real life. But, as you can see, this kind of realism isn't to everyone's liking. As a player, I would like to laugh at the heated discussions about the division of Arconia and the invasion of Greywater, and even participate in them myself, but the problem is that many owners of weak (or those that turned out to be weak at the moment) countries will really "complain" about unfair PvP and all that, so from the GM's point of view, it will be unpleasant. There will be no perfect balance, and if there is, it will no longer be interesting, which means many will refuse to participate. That's the situation.

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from Actaea

Statistics

Library

Users Online 9 users 1293 guests

Today's Visitors 17