Posts from Actaea

I'm just warning your astronauts about a possible danger...

I hope that when a Heroes player has 200 defense, I will have 250.

I don't have the poor and the rich; I have the Great Leader and everyone else.

Okay.
Let's clarify a few things right away. I didn't want to go into too much detail, because often things look worse on paper than they might turn out to be, and plus, surprises and interesting gameplay can be a pleasant thing.
In general,
There is a base: NS, and all initial characteristics (indicators in the analysis) are taken from there. Some have a good environment, some have healthy people, and some have miserable idiots, you get the idea.
NS is updated every twelve hours, and as a result, these two games cannot be played simultaneously.
What I want to do:
1. The indicators on NS are used to set the starting conditions. No more information is taken from the game website; the indicators are fixed.
2. All the fullness of state power is ENTIRELY in the hands of the player, and he can make legislative and other changes at his discretion, instead of waiting for the right issue for days/weeks/months. For these purposes, a pre-designed system and a list of these very laws will be used, with the conditions for their implementation and other details. And now, if the Security Council adopts some resolution and the country agrees to implement it, it will be implemented immediately. The mechanics for resolving social issues will be very simple, and if it concerns economic, industrial, and so on, then other game laws will be applied, which I haven't written yet, so I can't give details.
3. Players choose their technologies, culture bonuses (here, Arets, for example, can choose his own calendar; I initially only had various historical places as attractions for tourists, popular music, movies, and so on), and religions in a similar way. Perhaps, by the time it starts, there will be something else along these lines.
4. The original indicators on NS may have pleasant/unpleasant consequences, and some may not be taken into account at all. For example, corruption is a very unpleasant thing, and someone may be offended that, due to some other negative things (rudeness, for example), other players will not have such penalties.
5. In general, this will be a political and, depending on the development of events, a strategic simulator.

I haven't outlined all the ideas and details in full, but the essence should be clear from these points.

That is, you can, of course, continue to play as before and answer two issues a day, one of which is repeated, but I don't know, I'm starting to lose interest. I always enjoy role-playing and describing my country, but in general, nothing happens in the game itself: alliances are formed that play no role; resolutions are adopted that mean nothing; and so on.

What I'm getting at: tell me right away, should I do this, or will I simply waste millennia of time and in return receive only some one-line dissatisfied comment?
I will say right away that I will not make a game of the type "play and forget."

Great Chief and everyone else.

Equality))

I hope that when a Heroes player has 200 defense, I will have 250.

That's how it will be, because I successfully spent a good half of all the issue tickets of this kind in Old Quasardastan. And, judging by all, the repeats won't come too soon.

Seriously, think it over. Do you need this? (NS will no longer be taken into account). Will you play? Will you be ready to accept the game mechanics (or rather, the parameters) that I prepare? Will you be ready not to "get upset" when something goes wrong? Will you be ready not to complain about lost battles if it comes to that (I will calculate the battles in a way similar to Expeditions)?
No joke – implementing and running such things requires a truly enormous amount of time and effort (during the existence of Actea, I did much more than during all the Expeditions; I, of course, take into account my own journals and descriptions of the country that no one reads, but nevertheless).
Another option is to make a lighter version of all this; decide on the technologies and other things, simply add them to the description of your country, and use them for role-playing. This can be done, but it doesn't seem like a good idea to me; remember, for example, Arza's posts today about how "I've already studied this on NS!".

You said that creative tasks have an algorithm for solving them; you just need to develop it. I replied that there is no exact algorithm. As an example of when exact methods don't always exist, I used integration.

Okay.

And I also wanted to build up my defense to two hundred and my economy to one hundred, so please be patient.

We'll be waiting for a couple of years. )
-----
Revan, I'm fine with it. Although, in some ways, I agree with Arandor regarding the stats; it would have been better to stretch it out a bit more and say it a little earlier. But, since we've already started, let's go.

I had a feeling, Revan. It's indeed a bit amusing that we can impose sanctions on a country, but it won't really affect them at all. So, the decision to partially move the game's "engine" to the forum is a good idea (although I can't imagine how much effort, patience, and time it will take). But there are a couple of minor problems: a) It removes the point of non-aggression pacts. I will continue to develop Kvasardistan and maybe discuss some issues, but there won't be much point in doing so anymore. b) The death/serious crisis of a country that you created not in one evening (like a character), but over several months, will be somewhat more unpleasant for the potential player. This will, of course, add some interest to various political debates, but if I get destroyed))), it will cause a huge uproar. And then you won't be able to create a new character and continue the game. Of course, the advantage is that it gives meaning to the Strategic Board and all that, plus some interest. The problem is that if there is no interest, it will be a complete failure, and that would be sad. In short, I agree with the full version, and I can even help with something, do some calculations, I don't know, but then I would like to at least partially implement my ideas and continue there, I don't know, healing people and building ion cannons. AT LEAST THEN I WON'T HAVE TO WAIT TWELVE HOURS FOR THE REQUIRED ISSUE.

You should have turned back earlier, it will be too late later...

You're a tough sapper, Nebok...

I, of course, also take into account my own journals and descriptions of the country that no one reads.

If they gave defense and NHP points, then people would read them.

I would wait a bit longer until Ahassan becomes profitable in terms of NVP.

Even better, don't wait. I spent three months persistently pushing this parameter into the negative, and bringing it back to a normal level will take a very long time. And it's not about gameplay. Unless the POWER CHANGES.

Menta and his hadron collider

Oops, I thought I was building a hadron coliseum, my mistake!

Is it necessary (NS will no longer be taken into account),

We seemed to have agreed that at some point, this would happen. The new version looks more flexible on one hand, but on the other... I'll probably still try to align the NS and Revnev's Kittypinks as much as possible during the game.

will you play,

Maybe not too actively or thoughtfully, but I'll try, the idea is interesting.

will you be ready to accept the game mechanics (or rather, parameters) that I have prepared,

Yes, I might grumble a little, but I won't scream and demand what I want, the GM knows best.

will you be ready not to "get upset" when something goes wrong,

I can't do without it! But everything within reason, of course.

will you be ready not to get upset about lost battles if it comes to that (I will calculate the battles in a way similar to Expeditions).

If it's not like with "Call of Arms" in football, then I won't. And even then, I probably won't, Revnev has nothing to do but force the game to fit someone's requirements. But I will be a little upset, yes.

The downfall/serious crisis of a country that you built not in one evening (like a character), but over several months, will be somewhat more unpleasant for the potential player. This will, of course, add some interest to various political debates, but if I am destroyed))), it will cause a huge uproar. And then it will not be possible to create a new character and continue the game.

We just need to study the technology of time travel.