Posts from Tournament summary table.

I have been using such statistics for myself for a long time, and now I decided to organize them. The goal is to see who wins the most over the course of a year.
All online and real-life tournaments are taken into account, except for the seasonal league. Team tournaments are unclear how to count — whether the entire team or only the captains.
The "weight" of a tournament is not considered; Новичок is treated on par with СНГ.
Old tournaments, more than a year old, are discarded. For example, Новичок-2012 Summer will stop being counted after 20.11.2013.
Tournaments nearing completion: JC-3 and Diamond Monster will be counted after their official conclusion.
When allocating places, wins (gold) are considered first. In case of ties in wins — second places (silver), and if those are also tied — third places (bronze). (For two tournaments, I couldn't find who took 2nd-3rd places)
Such an Olympics! :)

I remember suggesting this idea to Pete a long time ago. But with a strength/importance coefficient for the tournaments and a coefficient based on the completion time. That is, so that old tournaments are taken into account in the ranking, but with a decreasing coefficient. For example, so that the coefficient decreases by 3% each month: Q = (0.97)^N, where N is the number of months since the tournament ended. Thus, victories from a year ago will bring 69% of the initial points, victories from two years ago - 48%, three years ago - 33%, and so on. Also, the number of prize-winning places from different tournaments should ideally be different. In the same WCup or FB, points can be given not only to the top three, but also to several positions after them. In team tournaments, the points are simply divided among the entire team.

For me, the most important thing is to have complete information: so many tournaments were held last year, and these guys took the prize-winning places. And from this information, each forum member will draw their own conclusions. Statistics are a strange thing. For team tournaments, I think it's necessary to list each player on the team. Just like at the Olympics, medals are awarded to all hockey or volleyball players. I'm leaning towards this option, but I still need to think about it. I don't see the point in accumulating results from tournaments that were 2-3 years ago. Look at favio – he took 2nd place in the Moscow real tournament and has disappeared since then: he doesn't play anymore and isn't visible on the forum. What's the point of stirring up the shadows of the past? Added the team tournament in the first post and 2nd and 3rd place in the only XL tournament (why didn't I see this before?).

Why dredge up the shadows of the past?

Why not take into account the results of old tournaments, but only for those who performed well in 2013 or still play in them?

Why not take into account the results of old tournaments, but only for those who showed good results in 2013 or still play?

We can do that. But why?

The **Jebus Cross-3** tournament has ended. Congratulations to the winners and runners-up, as well as to the organizer for successfully completing the competition. I have updated the leaderboard in the first post.

The Siberian Championship has ended; congratulations to the winner, participants, and organizers who gave us such a great tournament; it's a pity there weren't many streams. I've updated the table in the first post. The main forum tournament, The Final Battle 7, has ended. Congratulations to the winner, participants, and organizers. I've updated the table in the first post. The Novichok-13 Summer tournament has ended. Congratulations to the winner and prize-winners, and of course, to the organizers on the successful completion of the competition. I've updated the table in the 1st post. The King of the Hill tournament has ended. Congratulations to the participants, prize-winners, and organizers. And a special thank you for the streams. I've updated the table in the 1st post. The 2x2 Double Up team tournament has ended. Congratulations to the winners, participants, and organizers on the successfully held competition. I've updated the table in the 1st post. The real-life tournament, Kyiv-2014, has ended. Congratulations to the winner, participants, and organizer on the wonderful event! Four participants shared 2nd-5th places. I've updated the table in the 1st post.

The Diamond Monster tournament is over! Congratulations to the winner and all participants of the competition, as well as to the organizer for the successful completion.
I have updated the leaderboard in the first post.

Why isn't the "SOda is gone!" tournament included?

Why isn't the "SOda нет!" tournament being considered?

Could you please tell me who took the prize-winning places? I'll add them to the table. :) (I already know who won)
If I missed anything or made a mistake, feel free to write it here or in ICQ.

2.AlexTheGreat
3.Medium_HP

The results of the tournament have been taken into account: SoDa is out!.. I have updated the table in the first post.

The Crusade
Tournament start date – 02.08.2013
Number of players – 35
Tournament stage – Round 1 finals and Round 2 group stage
Number of remaining players – 34 (only MaxGor has officially withdrawn)
Planned completion date – March 10, 2014
Registration for the 3rd stage starts on – February 10, 2014

Actual player engagement in tournaments

The table and graph show player engagement based on the stages planned by the organizers. In early February, 30% become available, and in mid-March, 70% of tournament participants will be free.

The CIS-2-14 tournament in Minsk has ended. Organizing a real-life tournament is more challenging than an online one, but participating in it is more prestigious. Congratulations to the organizers and participants on the successful completion of the competition!
I have updated the table at the top of the thread.