Skip to content
#257
Auto-translated
Ganymed;82635
Excellent link! I would give it a thumbs up if I could.)))
The argument between Oleg and Anna is a symbol, in a way. A symbol of the division of the world, if you will. Faith and reason are two opposites of humanity. In this argument, I am on Oleg's side, although I cannot call myself an atheist. In reality, a conversation between logic and a believer (any believer) is like a dialogue between the blind and the deaf. Because the logician is blind to faith, and the believer is deaf to logic.)))
I completely disagree!
As Berserk rightly points out, logic is weakest among atheists – they claim that no absolute values exist, but at the same time they follow them, sacrificing themselves for the country, other people, etc.
And a religious worldview is very, very logical; not every one, of course – take Islam, for example – but, for example, Christianity passes the test of consistency very well.

By the way, you shouldn't think that by confirming the theory of evolution, you are destroying the foundations of Christianity (by the way, I am a supporter of the theory of evolution) – the reasoning of Teilhard de Chardin on this topic is very good (in general, it boils down to the fact that the divine spirit guided evolution); also, keep in mind that, although the Bible is a revelation, this revelation passed through the minds of people who lived in a certain era; naturally, they could not say anything about genetics or singularity, even if they saw the process of creation and evolution...

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil