Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
No one complains about random redirection, even though it's far worse.
Those who use it are well aware of what they're doing, assess the risks, and generally don't use it if there are more suitable options.
Killing a role with probabilistic protection happens either out of complete desperation (with 50% or higher chances), out of ignorance of the role, or with the calculation "Well, there's not much protection anyway, we'll definitely break through!" (20-33% chances). In the first case, a glimmer of hope suddenly doesn't help; in the second, it leads to "Oh, what's this? There's protection here! And it's unclear whether we'll break through it on the second try or not! And we might not break through on the third try either, ugh!", and in the third case... Do I need to say that 20% protection isn't always broken? Ah yes, for the second case, there's an alternative: when a role with 80% protection, some mega-cool maniac, suddenly sees their red name in the morning report...