Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
You can, of course, use the English language where Russian fails to convey certain concepts, but I suspect that "piercing crossbowmen," "long-orange archers," and "firebite warlords" don't sound quite as good.
By the way, ranged archers. Why not?
It's an excellent name, but we already have Storm Titans, and I don't like repetitions.
Even in different Factions? Well, you're cool. Although, I think it would be easier to change the name for the Titans.
Possibly. But it seems to me that this is gilding the lily.
The term "patron" itself does not imply an angel; a person can also be a patron. Just as an angel is not obliged to fulfill such a function.
Well, that's essentially a description of the unit's "character." I'm open to suggestions.
Impulsive Vikings, for example... Just a synonym. Oh, well, there was already such a suggestion.
A poisoner is not necessarily an assassin (and more often than not, it isn't), and an assassin is not necessarily specialized in poisoning. But an assassin-killer is gilding the lily (not every killer is an assassin, but every assassin is a killer).
Well, let it be...
The entire essence of the unit shouldn't be derived from the name. The purpose of the name is to maintain an association with it. A player who has at least once become familiar with gladiators and their abilities will always understand which unit is being discussed when they hear "gladiator-interceptor."
In principle, yes, but it would be better if it did, wouldn't it?