Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

It's time to set things straight... I was immediately impressed by the sheer number of false arguments and pseudo-arguments that the AK mollusks used to shape public opinion. Why would they need to do this if they were right? I also clearly saw that there was no point in continuing the discussion because every time one false argument was refuted, another one would be brought up. And since a proper online discussion requires timely responses to threads, I simply didn't see how I could possibly deal with all the crap the mollusks had piled up, especially when I only checked in around 11 or 12 o'clock. Being verbose has never been my weakness; you could say I was slow, clueless, and sometimes said things I should have kept to myself. But I always stood by my words, which seems to have upset the mollusks. This is also an achievement on my part.

Details: Oelm was caught red-handed loading saves without his opponent present during the turn delay.

You can get banned for this. Before this, I always looked at single-player saves in about 90% of my games. At least partly because it wasn't formally prohibited by the rules. Moreover, I sometimes consulted with other players about saves or discussed strategies. Sometimes I just showed the game through Viver, explaining what was happening. In the past, there used to be a tradition where people exchanged saves, looked at the position on the entire map, played, and trusted each other. The rules mention something idiotic about opening saves? What the hell does "opening" mean if I don't gain any extra information from it that I couldn't already get from a screenshot of the game? Pit indirectly confirmed that this wasn't against the rules when he opened this poll: /topic/at/645031/ Why would he need to do that if the situation were clear-cut?

He only appeared a couple of days later, giving completely confusing and vague explanations, essentially admitting that he did load the save but (!) just to look at it and focus, and then he left his computer, and the timer automatically counted down four days, ending the turn...

. Again, fabricating facts. According to the dates in ICQ, it's obvious that the conversation with Tvarina took place the very next evening (or rather, night). Vagueness is more likely due to spoken language. You might mumble incoherently after a bottle of rum, for example. What was unclear? I explained the situation as I saw it. What exactly was confused? We'll see the answer later.

We had a strong feeling that the saves were tampered with (there was plenty of time for that), mainly because the sent saves (specifically 126) differed from the save on the screenshot by exactly one hour (Oelm either didn't know or simply made a mistake), and because Oelm perfectly understood that the saves no longer mattered (as he clearly stated in the conversation).

Apparently, AK became so obsessed with their own importance that they didn't even think to test whether there would be any difference in the game dates. But why bother when you can use special tools for lying and distorting things? Why did they need to ask ME about different dates? It seems this just didn't register in their jelly-like brains. In general, the context suggests that there are actually no facts, but the question of GUILT has turned into a question of TRUST. There are no facts, as Petenev said:

Why should we delve into the saves and figure out the extent of maphacking and its impact on the game? We're not interested in figuring out what else happened and guessing what might have been.

Not "not interested," but incapable. The impact of maphacking on the game is irrelevant; that would be a REAL accusation. But there is distrust towards me personally. And frankly, I don't care what the Autistic Comedians think about my GAME. Wicc:

Nevertheless, let me say this - it's not right to act crazy and wave your fingers around when talking to authorized people.

Thank you for the advice, but who are these "authorized" people? They are a bunch of impotent spirits. I wasn't even sure why they took on the role of judges. I know respected people and players who have a very low opinion of their human qualities. And I think poorly of their gaming skills. For me, AK was like some kind of prosecutor-like organization. They should accuse, gather evidence of cheating. But the FORUM should make the decision. At least regarding the Championship matches. Here, the question is really about trust. Did I move heroes? Well, I accidentally moved them across an already explored map. Is THAT a big deal? Look at the date of the conversation in ICQ – around 6 am Moscow time. I got up at 7 am. I wasn't psychologically ready for the game; it was just awkward for my opponent because the game had been postponed about four times due to my fault. Then there was a game that lasted approximately eight hours with a break. Just experiment on yourself, even if you're completely healthy. In that state, you might send someone the wrong message by mistake. I apologized for my negligence in the game. I also apologize separately to Tanya for this. They suggest that I repent for something. Numone - will you crack under pressure anywhere? There will be a formal ban on viewing saves in single-player mode; I will behave differently from now on, but for now, I will play according to my understanding. The Apogee:

Quote:
Message from Kilgor
I don't think Indra is a cheater in the truest sense of the word; I don't rule out the possibility that this is his first time.
This option will have to be ruled out.

Spring season 2009.
SEM_56 received a load during replay several days later than the game was delayed.
http://forum.heroesworld.ru/showthre...t=5780&page=18
From 267 – Oelm’s report, then 273 and up to 282.
It's almost exactly the same situation as now.
Almost four years have passed since then. You need to be quite optimistic to believe that there were only two such situations.

Situation: Little Petya (consider coincidences with real people to be accidental) got beaten up four years ago. Petya got beat up last weekend. Does it follow that Petya is a loser who constantly gets beaten up? According to Pit for LM, yes. In reality, maybe Petya is cool; he just had bad luck those two times. Maybe he's used to winning, or maybe he saved someone's life in those four years. History is silent. But according to the logic of the AK mollusks, Petya is a chump because of these episodes. I want to remind you that during this time, I won many games against very strong players, and even if I lost, it was usually a close fight. With streams and without. I played for money, up to $500 per game. There were many interesting games with top players from the CIS and beyond. I took third place in an offline tournament /topic/9301/, where I convincingly outperformed the best player of 2012 according to HW, losing only to Eldegernon, a cheater, and Dmitriy_AS, an offline titan. I completely crushed the #2 player of 2012 in two games and fought on equal terms in all games against the #3 player according to HW and the champion of the CIS in VT version - 2013. ...This will be my last post – a summary with attachments – screenshots about the "one-hour difference in dates" and pictures showing what AK should do, as I imagine it, etc., due to message size limitations.