1. Read it again.

2. For your statement to work:

it is sometimes useful to read a topic like this.

For my statement to work, it is most useful to play with someone you have already played with and are convinced of their honesty. Everything is best learned through personal experience.

3. Personal motives.
Regarding the impossibility of proving something, or about "repentance" - these are not essential things, since no one will face any administrative, let alone criminal, punishment... we are only talking about reputation - which practically does not require proof - and 99% facts will do.

That's what I'm talking about: without 100% proof of guilt, you are ready to simply slander the name of a possibly completely honest player. Is that right?
I haven't looked at the save file; I'm not interested in it. I've seen controversial save files, and after the second or third one, they all got boring. It is impossible to prove with 100% certainty. There is always room for chance. That's the first thing. Secondly, a player may be playing completely recklessly, and where you see malicious intent, cunning plans, save file analysis, map analysis, etc., it may be simply thoughtlessness, he just went there because he clicked there with the mouse. Before announcing a name, think twice. Think about how this person will feel. And think about the fact that one day you might find yourself in their place, even if you are not guilty of cheating.