Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

After Helen's reply a little higher, the discussion definitely doesn't deserve any more attention; it didn’t from the start. Kamikaze should receive a reprimand for his unwillingness to play fair and a warning that if he continues to write such nonsense in the AK, he will receive a preventive ban from all tournaments for several months. No problem, just need to think with your head when you are distracting people. Even in tennis, despite having an automatic system for determining whether the ball is in or out of bounds, players are only allowed three incorrect challenges. I think the AK can afford to be stricter and limit itself to two instances of dealing with blatant absurdity. This isn't professional work (for money) where they deal with these glitches. The essence of the "complaint" lies in the fact that Kamikaze claims that the "date of discovery" for the reason for technical restart is day 112, but in reality, the "date of discovery" was when it became clear that the second path did not lead to GO, and this was certainly not day 112. And 112 is the day Helen informed the opponent that there might be a technical restart. And if the date of discovery is not 112, but the game continued only until day 113? Then what is the "date of discovery"? Correct. Day 113. There are no other options. As of the end of turn 112, the question about the second path remained open. (This is for lovers of jurisprudence). Is anyone discussing the fact that there is no GO on the road at all? No, they aren’t. There is no GO, and this is an obvious technical issue. Is this some kind of complex arithmetic problem regarding the date of discovery? If someone wanted to think carefully about the given topic, they would figure it out themselves in 10-15 minutes and wouldn't distract everyone with their writing (this also applies to Vik). It would be okay if there was any meaning to it (like in my lengthy posts Kappa), but there isn't. Kamikaze receives a warning. The matter is closed. Thank you all for your attention. And if he starts arguing now, ask for that video, and if the video shows that Helen wrote to him that there was another unchecked path where there might be GO, then immediately ban him from all tournaments for 3 months. Whatever name you give the yacht... In this case, Helen wasn't really wrong. For Blitz, he performed more or less close to perfectly.