Moldy Pearl Barley Auto-translated

Siv, you could have just left it. I can read those messages anyway.

I know. And I really liked the idea of writing to you using a remote message; it's almost like a PM, but in a separate thread. It's simply amazing, and I don't know why I didn't think of it before.

Arandor, have you completely lost it?
You're using your privileges again. You don't have the right to read deleted messages.

No, thank you, I'd rather decline such naive, silly, self-assured cuteness.

What's with the attitude? (You used to be nice and recently called me cute.)

I do have the rights, but the right... well, in this case, it's permissible, and what if there was profanity or something else inappropriate, requiring points to be awarded, huh? So don't whine.

Should points be awarded for remote play? Isn't that ridiculous?

I support Prince Omega; moderators who go to extremes are absurd, which they seem to realize themselves.

Our logic professor, called the reduction to absurdity a "women's arguments". Probably, Ara had something similar, that's where he derived this. Ara doesn't realize that it referred to an absurdity built on emotions ("Couldn't you be a bit nicer to my friend?" - "Maybe I should sleep with him too?"), and not the kind that simply highlights the essence of the problem, as in Lizard's case.

Firstly, the spelling is killing me, especially the failure to maintain subordinate connection in phrases. Is this some kind of quasi-psychological contextual trolling? If so, then Siv contradicts himself here in his attempt to seriously define the problem. The essence of the problem is also unclear. There are only words like "something similar" and "this," and even between them, the semantic link is blurred; it's unclear whether it refers to a consequence or to the same phenomenon. The quote is expressionless and looks like context ripped out, which overall adds further blurriness to the perception.
so I still haven't understood what Siv wanted to say...

First of all, it's the spelling that kills, especially the failure to maintain subordinate relationships in a phrase.

Well, I often encounter a failure to maintain subordinate clauses, but as for spelling... it's strange, I can hardly believe that I could have written "absurd." If I were using mind-altering substances, I would definitely think that it was their fault, but as it is...
I'm puzzled. Can moderators really remove a message that says they edited it?
Now, I'll explain what I wanted to say, simply and in points:
There is such an argument in a dispute - reductio ad absurdum. It occurs in two versions:
a) Reductio ad absurdum, which should emphasize the essence of the problem, because the opponent may not see it (the problem).
b) Reductio ad absurdum due to an overly emotional reaction to what is happening and/or as a form of mockery (that inexpressive quote).
Our logic teacher called point "b" a "feminine argument," referring to the fact that women often resort to it.
I suggested that Arandor, as a person who studied at an institute (at that time I forgot that he was a distance learning student), might have concluded from his educational process that "reductio ad absurdum is a feminine argument."
I pointed out that points "a" and "b" differ from each other, and therefore, Ar was mistaken when he said:

Well, you're like a woman. You immediately go to extremes.

Because, as I said above, women resort to point "b," but in your case, it was point "a."
Is that clear enough? People who cannot understand information in a concise form deserve to be burned.

Mind-blowing
...

Can't moderators remove a message that says they edited it?

Do you want to blame me for your illiteracy? Tsk, tsk.

Maybe, Sivvi. But you need to know how, and Arko is a noob, so it's unlikely he did it.

Horror!

Wissy took a hit.

I am right, but the right... well, in this case, it's okay, and what if there was profanity or something else bad, requiring points to be awarded, huh? So don't whine.

Here, he realized his mistake and deleted it. Next to Jesus, some bandit was crucified; he confessed his sins to Jesus, and Jesus forgave him. And yes, how does this case differ from the others?

Also, I've noticed that Sivvi has been making a lot of spelling mistakes lately. It's as if he's been replaced.