Posts from Strange love.

well, it depends on how you look at this issue:eek: there are more and more of them!!!
there weren't as many before, and people lived normally! Of course, I don't understand this, but I'm still against it! There are no crematoriums in them

How come this wasn't the case before? Even in Greece, it was considered normal. Then it stopped being considered normal, and now it's okay again. Personally, I'm against it because it goes against my nature. But you can't just kill people. Although, on the other hand, when every other stylist is gay, it really makes you want to do something.

muhoha)) Sophocles, my comrade)))))
I personally don't care) let them fight, it doesn't affect me)) they're not bothering me) it's their life and their choice, why interfere with them))) it just gets your hands dirty;DDD

Loken, it's precisely because I'm afraid of being touched that I'm against it. And I think it would be disgusting to watch:D

I have a very negative attitude towards same-sex love between men. I don't understand it and I want it to not exist at all as a phenomenon.
I don't even know how to feel about same-sex love between women. I should feel negatively about it, but when I watch women interact with each other, I sometimes involuntarily suspect that they feel some attraction to each other, and these are normal women... Although I still have a negative attitude towards this, it seems more natural and understandable. I like women, why can't they like each other? They are also normal people just like me.

Added after 9 minutes
But if I can somehow come to terms with relationships and not pay attention to them, then the legalization of same-sex marriage is, in my opinion, the height of idiocy. I am surprised that people didn't immediately disperse these parties and presidents who passed such laws. Who is sitting in parliament?

It saddens me that this happened in France, one of the most romantic countries in the world, and with such an unromantic attitude... Okay, in England, they have certain quirks, but France – that's just nonsense.
If we talk about attitudes towards the issue, there are only two: a logical one (such a marriage cannot produce children, therefore it is inherently stupid and no better than bestiality or something similar) and a tolerant one (oh-oh-oh, they are poor, sick people, we need to treat them with understanding, although in reality they are not sick at all, but simply perverts, and those doctors who, according to the fashion, say that there is such a disease, need to be retrained at medical universities, they simply do not understand how the human body works).
Well, that's the situation. And in general, one can add: this was said mainly in relation to those who flaunt their non-traditional orientation. I will not judge those who, having fallen into perversion, realized its horror and tries with all their might to overcome it, even if it doesn't work right away. If that's the case, then yes, it is a trial that a person can and should overcome, like any other. And if the government wants to somehow influence the situation in this regard, then it should help people overcome their shortcomings, rather than indulge them.

In the case of France, I don't like the fact that they were talking about replacing the words "mom" and "dad" with "parent 1" and "parent 2." This is as silly as when they recently banned such a beautiful word as "mademoiselle." Although this is related to feminists, who have also gone too far. Okay, there are serious situations where there is real discrimination or violation of rights. But lately, it has started to reach absurdity, with too much fanaticism appearing in these movements, and people are coming up with so many stupid things that it only worsens the attitude towards them.
As for the adoption of children, I haven't fully made up my mind on this issue yet. I've heard different opinions about it, even that children in same-sex couples are more likely to attempt suicide. In any case, the main thing is to consider the child's wishes, if he is, of course, already capable of thinking and distinguishing. By the way, I also heard that only 5% (or so) of homosexual couples in France want to adopt a child. That is, they were simply seeking rights, a change of words, but almost no one is going to take children.

sometimes, you can't help but suspect that they have some kind of attraction to each other.

.........................................

Since I am male, I like blue-colored males because the more of them there are, the more women I, as a natural male, will have access to. It will also be easier for me to seduce them. But I hate lesbians because they won't give me what I want.
If I were born female, I would have the opposite attitude.

In the case of France, I don't like the fact that they were talking about replacing the words "mom" and "dad" with "parent 1" and "parent 2".

I'm curious, which parent gets number 1, and which gets number 2? And doesn't this smell like some kind of discrimination?:D:D:D

the more of them there are, the more women I, a natural male, will get.

Women are available to men. And a natural male will get natural female counterparts.:D:D:D

I don't care – women, females, or chicks ))) The names don't matter! The main thing is that they aren't too expensive and have attractive figures )))))

Women are meant for men. And a natural male should have natural females.:D:D:D

What is the difference between a woman and a natural female? Which is better, a woman or a natural female? If you think about it seriously, the answer isn't so straightforward...

Added 2 minutes later
At the very least, on a deserted island, it's probably better to be with natural females than with women...

With females of what biological species, if you don't mind me asking?

With females of what biological species, I'm a little embarrassed to specify?

Homo Sapiens.

Here's another great topic.

What is your opinion on SAME-SEX love?

I don't have an opinion on it.