Posts from WT Nostalgy

There's a difference between violating ethics, which is what 95% of WTS players suffer from, and violating the game rules, which could have led to changes in the game (2 stats taken before major cons could have influenced the rest of the game). Your opinion seems biased to me.

I told him that I overreacted.

Especially for Samurai:
We can draw the following conclusions: player Samurai confirmed the game report with HellLighT, which means there were no complaints about the game. Furthermore, both of them played against their opponents in different game lobbies. Ambra and Tofsla are not obligated to replay anything if anyone has doubts about the games of the completed round.

The decision is very strict, and honestly, I feel sorry for Tofsla, but in this case, I personally am completely unbiased on Helllight's side. Back in the day, "when WT was dying" — about 4 years ago, I came to HW permanently and started playing in tournaments here. So I'll never forget a game with Toganash in one of the OZV tournaments, when the AC forced a replay because of an even smaller detail than a +1 upgrade picked up without clearing the guard. I was seriously burned up back then, wanted to send all of HW far away for a long time. But then I pulled myself together and came to the conclusion that the approach was correct — the rules are the same for everyone. You can't "violate just a little bit." Either you violated, or you didn't.

Conclusions on the game Helllight vs Tofsla

No obvious maphack was observed, and an implicit one could be imagined anywhere. Overall, Tofsla's moves have logic, including the last move, which probably raised the most questions.

BUT!

A detailed review of the moves revealed that on turn 116, Tofsla violated point "8" (Past the guard, you can only take resources, campfires, and mills — everything else must be cleared, even if you have control. First the guard is fought, then the object is picked up. For Jebus, you must clear the guard to enter the adjacent zone).
He took an upgrade and a Priest without clearing the guard, gaining +1 to attack and +1 to spell. Whether it was intentional or not, how much it affected the outcome — is not that important, the fact is the fact.

For the future: if in doubt, you should make a save (so as not to lose the timer) and send it to the judges for clarification, or, as a last resort, to an experienced player.

This is a tournament with prizes, let's all pay closer attention to the rules!

Result:

There was no maphack. The game results are voided, a replay is required with streams from both sides, to avoid repeating conflicts!

No, Yegor, this isn't foolishness, but a sport, and therefore a matter of self-discipline. I assure you, in none of my current games, even if you examine every move under a microscope, you won't find anything to criticize. The same goes for Anton and the other players who take the game seriously, and not just "spend the evening riding horses with a beer." Bringing real life into this is not correct; we are not dealing with issues of restricting freedom, etc. This, I repeat, is a sport. They looked at the slow-motion replay: a goal was scored with a violation, it was disallowed, let's go to overtime (like in hockey, for example).