Auto-translated
in theory, a second round wouldn't hurt, to see which option they prefer, those who voted for Ekb.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
in theory, a second round wouldn't hurt, to see which option they prefer, those who voted for Ekb.
But the question is different: who will actually come, and what if the price increases by at least 20-30% per person? It would be unpleasant for both the organizers and the participants.
But the decision has been made by the COMMUNITY.
The decision has been made.
So, the 24 people who voted for Yekaterinburg don't have the right to decide whether they want to go to Volgograd or Korolev?
We could skip the second round; those who voted for Yekaterinburg could simply state where they would go, and that would be it.
Based on the voting results, they have the right to decide whether or not to go to Volgograd.
It doesn't seem to be working out very well.
...I think you have every right to quickly discuss among yourselves the fate of your votes, openly joining another...
I wish the elections in Belarus were held like that:rolleyes:
What's the problem with people gathering in each city, and who voted for which one? Since they voted, it means it suits them in terms of preferences, finances, and other aspects. The number of people is distributed in such a way that a decent tournament can be organized in each city where participants are present.