Posts from Expedition: general discussions. Auto-translated

You just want to go crazy...

1-3-2, based on the amount of interesting information provided.

you can go to any expansion with the Cuckoo.

A simple task for a fool.
I'm for FACTIONS.

1>2>3, Ples )

x2

depending on the amount of interesting information.

Maybe I'll make slightly more detailed descriptions later. The systems will be similar for 1 and 2, with adjustments for the presence of mutations in #1.

You just want to go crazy...

It's best to play as the "crazy" faction; there are fewer restrictions...

Why play Schism if it's just a censored version?

You can also play in the SoS (Sword of Souls) mode...

What is SoS?

Champion Corruption.

What is SoS?

Something like that.

I was thinking about a character parameter scheme and wondered how many parameters would best affect the gameplay. For example, if we had 8 parameters, each responsible for two characteristics, would that provide a wider range of character development options and greater differentiation compared to having only four parameters?

And what are those eight? And which characteristics do they affect? The main problem here is that out of the three main gameplay styles – warrior, archer, mage – the mage needs the fewest parameters for successful gameplay, while the warrior needs the most. The greater the variance, the less balance there will be.

Hmm, I outlined it here, wanting to make all the parameters almost equally useful, but in the end, it turns out that you need to level up practically everything, and then you need to look at the numbers that will be given for one point of a specific parameter, in order to ultimately balance them so that the characters don't turn out to be lopsided or, conversely, overpowered.

I just had some additional details in mind that many would probably consider unnecessary or difficult to implement.