Posts from Online tournament: The best hero.

Some haven't specified their castle and hero yet, and I don't know who will be the red player!!!
Regarding the technical draws, I'll update everything in the statistics today!!!

Dear JOIS, today's deadline is in an hour, but there are still no changes. I still see T(t) :eek:
And I've indicated my options for the second round.

Question – I’m still waiting for my opponent… there’s been no news from him… and I’m leaving tomorrow – for the whole weekend… there won’t be a chance to play… But what if he shows up during that time? What should I do? Will it be possible to play next week? (if he does show up – I’ve been waiting for a very long time. And he didn’t even show up for the first round).

Regarding the question about recruiting wyverns – I reviewed the source data, and here is my verdict: this could not have happened on this map, unless the hero had diplomacy skill leveled up. You can confidently request a description of the game up to the point of recruiting the wyverns. At a minimum, it should be clear: - which hero is recruiting; - what army he has; - what secondary skills and parameters the hero has; - the amount of gold and other resources; - the day on which the recruitment takes place. This does not necessarily have to be a save from your game; you can try playing again from the starting save, let the opponent show how he managed to recruit a wyvern. Otherwise, I believe that the organizers should not count the results of this game (at least, until the circumstances are clarified). P.S. Mozay – I’m waiting for you for an online game in the “The best of Hero” tournament. And why does the red player (swamp) have a Grail in the attached final save?

Dear tournament participants, please consider the situation with the teams Kamikaze-Tim and Pankratov-Sfef. These teams were unable to play their first-round matches on time. How many points should I award to these players?

Dear tournament participants, please consider the situation with Kamikaze-Tim and Pankratov-Sfef. These pairs were unable to play their first-round matches on time. How many points should I award to these players?

If neither pair even tried to negotiate, then 0 points for everyone! If at least one of them wrote that they were ready to play and were waiting for their opponent, then award a technical victory to that player...

Enough talk! I sent the save files to the organizers!!! And Crash refused to accept the save because he already checked everything and they seemed fine to him! If anyone has any questions, contact me on ICQ!

There are no complaints against Crash; you did nothing wrong. I just expressed myself poorly, and you were right to be a little concerned. I probably would have done the same. But since I create save files every week, or even more often, I could have checked everything!

I'm attaching the save files for all those who are skeptical. The archive contains 1 file from the game and 2 files that I created 20 minutes ago for easy verification. Unfortunately, I didn't lose a wyvern in the battle for the 4 angels....but I don't think that's important.

Dudge gave me a game save. I'm giving it to you; let everyone try it and share their opinion.

I'm shocked :eek:, but they really are joining!
There's no arguing with that now...

To Dudge i CrasH - we apologize!!!
Indeed, everything is correct; the wyverns joined – this was our mistake (a flaw in the map). I suggest you replay! You can choose any time before the end of the first round of the tournament.

P.S. This will not happen again – we will be more attentive!

Well, to prevent this from happening, it seems that
when editing a random map, you need to set each monster to be aggressive.

ALTHOUGH IT’S NOT ENTIRELY CORRECT, I SUGGEST REPLAYING THIS GAME FROM THE BEGINNING, STARTING FROM THE POINT WHERE THE VIVERNS WERE JOINED, AND PLAYING WITHOUT THEM...

Please enjoy.
----------------------------------------------------------------
/topic/at/93875/
/topic/at/95173/
/topic/at/93505/
----------------------------------------------------------------
The first round is from June 1st to June 8th. The opponent writes on ICQ at 10, and appears on the forum at 13!

To Dudge i CrasH - we apologize!!!
Indeed, everything is correct, the wyverns joined – this was our mistake (a flaw in the map). We suggest you replay! You can choose any time before the end of the first round of the tournament.

P.S. This will not happen again – we will be more attentive!

I apologize for interfering; it's not really my business. But I read and read, and decided to add my two cents.
First, the issue was raised that the wyverns joined, and they argued about the possibility of this. Of course, the total number of wyverns at the end of the game was somewhat unusual. But the fact that they could join is a fact. To see this, it was enough to look at their status in the editor (it is not necessary to have the diplomacy skill and a lot of money – it is enough to have a more or less equal number of troops, similar to the ones that joined, as well as their initial position status at the time of the initial map creation, which is always different with each restart). And there was no need to raise this issue publicly because of some plus or minus 10-20 wyverns, which, in my opinion, no longer mattered after more than 50 had joined. I understand that this was a subtle hint of cheating. But think logically, would a person really go to such lengths after such good fortune in the form of fifty level 6 units? Judging by your discussion, it seems that this was not enough for him, and he decided to acquire another ten units by unfair means. In my opinion, this is nonsense. If no one can accurately calculate the probability of such a number of troops, then why announce it publicly? It could all have been resolved privately and without bringing it to the attention of everyone. In the future, to prevent this from happening again, those who edit maps should indicate "bloodthirsty" in the properties of each monster.
But I couldn't resist and expressed my opinion after the tournament organizers canceled the game and told both players to replay. But why should they replay? In violation of what rules and regulations are they obliged to replay? Everything was fair, and the fact that the wyverns turned out to be "compliant" is not the fault of the participants, but of the map creators.
Once again, I apologize for interfering.

Why would I have to replay? I didn't break any rules. So what's the problem?
And the next turn is for Barbarian Deсса.

Question - I'm still waiting for my opponent... no news, no sign of him... and I'm leaving tomorrow - for the whole weekend... there's no chance to play... What if he shows up during that time? What should I do? Can we play next week? (if he does show up - I've been waiting for too long. And he didn't show up for the first round either)

That's it... I'm leaving now... I don't know if Sfeff will show up, but I waited and waited... I didn't wait in vain... And I didn't hear anything specific about this from the organizers...
Goodbye to everyone... I'll be on the forum on Monday evening or even Tuesday... I