Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
And when there is no GO in the passage (on the road!) to the opponent's respawn, it's quite reasonable to assume that it has been broken through..
This important point is apparently hard to grasp. How many times have I played Jebus Cross, never once encountered a respawn without GO, only heard about it. Also, if we follow the rules, you cannot pass without breaking through the guard. Apply this rule here - who to fight, there is no one to fight here. The rule doesn't work. It's not clear why those losses were incurred! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiHq5r1-8lk
It's a truly absurd situation: so, when playing as Warlock, I'm not allowed to attack the opponent (even if I have enough power to break through any Town Hall without losses) until the opponent breaks through their own Town Hall?! And what if the opponent just sits in their Town Hall forever and skips turns on purpose?? By the way, here's another example: the opponent constantly sits in the Sanctuary, only venturing out once a week to capture a Castle and then return. How can we fight against such unfair gameplay? Or does it immediately result in a draw, no questions asked?! Does this kind of nonsense really bother all our players?? Okay, we dealt with the "captain's hat" issue after a precedent. Isn't it time for us to review and include other highly controversial and conflicting points in the rules?!
I genuinely don't understand why Cobra started talking about "fairness" and the unacceptability of exploiting game mechanics:D. Being a top-tier exploiter and simply a "fair player," the "most consistent" organizer of tournaments.
ICQ is DEAD! Write here: my discord account is flate#4193 __________________ I'm fucking Luck like a dirty BITCH! :smile51:
By the way, here's a similar example: the opponent constantly sits in the Sanctuary, only venturing out once a week to capture a Castle and then returning.
A similar situation occurred in a tournament game about a year or two ago. The judge ruled that the player sitting in the Sanctuary lost because, theoretically, after N months of gameplay, the player controlling the map would gather enough armies to defend both cities simultaneously. This situation is analogous to catching angels with skeletons that have -1 morale, as seen in a recent match between Hellight and Dave – a victory algorithm was declared that requires a very large amount of time.
Стримы HMM5 на полных картах мод TE: ru.twitch.tv/noom11
Alex_nv - draw - Vovan112013 летос 236
alex_nv wrote: Наконец то нормальная игра с открытием половины карты.
By the way, here's another example from the same category: the opponent constantly sits in the Sanctuary, only venturing out once a week to capture a Castle and then returning.
Wow, that's quite a comparison. Exploiting a bug with the generator and using a game object for its intended purpose are two different things.
Let's put an end to this pointless discussion. I've already said that I wouldn't support Silent Hill in this context, but when the "alleged" violation occurred – in my opinion, it didn't warrant even a replay – player Wowa took the game passwords and confirmed his defeat through a technical knockout. By doing so, he agreed with the result. To rephrase: if player Wowa had saved the game during the violation and conversation with his opponent and appealed to the tournament judges, he would have almost certainly avoided a technical defeat. So, in the future, in controversial situations, please contact the tournament judges, as Sladyish already mentioned above.
Finally, I'll say about this situation that 100% of players, when playing for stakes, would insist on having 2 paths to the center and a "go" option (allegedly, you could have bypassed and gone through another path!). This is my opinion.
I sincerely don't understand why Cobra started talking about "fairness" and the unacceptability of exploiting game mechanics?:D Being a top-tier exploiter and simply a "fair player," the "most consistent" organizer of tournaments.
Flute, where did you even come from to judge me?! Provide at least a couple of examples of unfair play, or go back where you came from.
submitted a complaint to the organizers/judges (yesterday) and an appeal regarding in-game actions (today) – not his own, but those of his opponent. We are waiting for the result.
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"
Looks like this guy isn't quite right in the head. People are politely telling him that honest players don't win, and he's coming up with all sorts of moves, views, and castle captures:confused:
This is coming from someone who himself cheats against weaker players in the subway.
This is written by someone who himself begs for wins with Redrush in the metro.
You should have kept quiet, Diabler. I wasn't begging; I wasn't even aware of this rule until Romantic wrote to me. And by the time, it was too late to replay with you. If you had written to me right away, I would have replayed for sure. Instead, you quietly submitted a complaint, and they clearly and understandably told you to go away. Again, I didn't decide this, and I didn't beg. So don't whine now and mislead people. You're probably a pushover in life too. If you had said this to me in person, I would have quickly taken care of you....
You should have kept quiet, Diablo. I wasn't begging, I wasn't aware of this rule until Romantic wrote to me. And it was too late to replay with you, that's all. He should have written to me right away, instead of going to the judges. I would have replayed for sure. And then I quietly submitted an application, and they clearly and understandably told you to go away. Again, it wasn't me who decided this, and I didn't beg. So don't whine now and don't mislead people. You're probably a pushover in life too. If you had told me this in person, I would have quickly put you in your place....
That's exactly why I didn't beg and wasn't aware of it. Probably that's why you wrote the report almost on the last day, a week and a half after we played :smile04:. Otherwise, they might not have counted it and made us replay, but the victory was so important, so important :smile04:.