Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Let's put an end to this pointless discussion. I've already said that I wouldn't support Silent Hill in this context, but when the "alleged" violation occurred – in my opinion, it didn't warrant even a replay – player Wowa took the game passwords and confirmed his defeat through a technical knockout. By doing so, he agreed with the result. To rephrase: if player Wowa had saved the game during the violation and conversation with his opponent and appealed to the tournament judges, he would have almost certainly avoided a technical defeat. So, in the future, in controversial situations, please contact the tournament judges, as Sladyish already mentioned above.
Finally, I'll say about this situation that 100% of players, when playing for stakes, would insist on having 2 paths to the center and a "go" option (allegedly, you could have bypassed and gone through another path!). This is my opinion.