Posts from Round table

How can the damage value against a single fairy be less than 0, especially when it's an unreturned attack? Also: "- Value of the hex from which the attack is launched. Here, the base value of the hex is taken, and part of the attack information is added to it: the value of the archers' block, the value of burning or hitting additional stacks with an area attack, the penalty for the enemy burning or hitting additional stacks with a return area attack. If the creature is large, the worst value of the two hexes it will occupy is taken." - Does this include damage from the wall, or is it assumed that it is still taken into account?

I think I understand correctly that griffons won't attack head-on just for one fake unit, but they will if the wall is 1 tile further away. So, they will attack head-on if the fake unit is, say, 50+?

This is also about the troglodyte in the Nagabanka.
"Thus, a two-unit stack may not attack in a situation similar to the "invisibility" bug of a stack behind a wall of fire: if the base hazards of the hexes are such that, in the best position to attack this enemy, the front hex of the stack will end up on a "hazardous" hex, and the rear hex on a non-hazardous one, then this enemy may be ignored.
For example, you can add 100 djinn and 1 fairy to a hero's army; place a town (not a tower or a Stronghold, so that it has no native terrain) with a fort and without a Stronghold, with 1 monster guarding it. Attack the town, position the fairy in the middle row, 2 hexes to the left of the gate (the farthest cell from the monster, so that it can reach the fairy), and have the djinn take cover. After this, the monster will not attack the fairy, but will only move so as not to be exposed to the djinn's attack. The reason is the same as with the wall of fire, only the role of the wall is played by the hazardous hexes within the djinn's range."

I've always wanted the number of guards not to be limited to the range of 7..100, meaning that you could encounter 1000 hobbits or 1 archangel. Who else thinks that the game would become more diverse as a result?

I've always wanted the number of guards not to be limited to the range of 7..100, meaning that you could encounter 1000 hobbits or 1 archangel. Who else thinks that the game would become more diverse as a result?

Oh, yes. The game will become more diverse, especially for the Necromancer :smile08:

1000 hobbits for a Necromancer – can you imagine what a boost that would be? And I wouldn't want to have to catch 2 Archdevils instead of 10 Nagas.

Why do streamer players sometimes place a single stack of troops exactly in the middle? Aesthetics at the expense of the timer?
Also, to transfer the entire army, it's often faster to transfer 1 stack and press F11.

In the first week, this is a stop signal for Necropolis. But you only confirmed my main idea - there are more variations now.
Hobbits are only 1/140 of all monsters and quite dangerous as well... but a peasant would really have to be banned.