Posts from My utopia. Auto-translated

Anarchy
Total lack of government or authority, marked by unusually high political, social and economic freedoms.

Authoritarian Democracy
Nation where the people are allowed to vote but are usually told who to vote for and they do so, happily.

Benevolent Dictatorship
A dictatorship ruled by someone who pays no attention to the people and allows them to do whatever they want, except challenge the government.

Capitalist Paradise
No restrictions whatsoever are placed on trade; civil rights and political rights are not repressed but take a back seat to the economy.

Capitalizt
Society where corporations rival the government in power.
It's all about business. Civil rights are generous.

Civil Rights Lovefest
System that emphasize the will of the individual and his/her will over that of society or government - individual freedom social equality and mutual aid are the norm.

Compulsory Consumerist State
Government that actively promotes belief that the society that shops together, stays together and everyone better be on board with that or else.

Conservative Democracy
System where the people are politically free to vote and change things, yet rarely do, preferring to maintain the status quo.

Corporate Bordello
Free trade, free market, not-so-free merchandise. Civil rights are moderate; political rights are generous.
Government-by-corporation where the people elect corporate entities to represent them based on their values or employment.

Corporate Police State
Government controlled by corporations where the people are told what to buy, when to buy it and why they have to buy it.

Corrupt Dictatorship
A totalitarian state in which the government will interfere with everything, lowering political and economic rights and adopting a fluctuating civil rights policy.

Democratic Socialists
nlightened form of socialism marked by the populace having a measure of political freedom yet having most of the infrastructure controlled by the government.

Father Knows Best State
The government will usually interfere in the lives of everyone. It works like a parent. One does what they think is best.

Free-Market Paradise
People are free to vote and make money but have few civil rights.

Inoffensive Centrist Democracy
'Generic' or 'classic' form of government in which there is a head of government and the citizens share some of the power in the ruling of the people.

Iron Fist Consumerists
Nation where all people are tools in a large economic machine where they are both the producers as well as the consumers to the exclusion of much else.

Iron Fist Socialists
Strictly enforced equality where the people are referred to as 'the collective' and criticizing the government isn't an option.

Left-Leaning College State
Government run by civil rights activists with liberal political beliefs exemplified by pie-in-the-sky college students.

Left-wing Utopia
Government by equals for equals that keeps a close eye on business which it distrusts and is often socialized for the good of the people.

Libertarian Police State
Citizens are proud of their wide-ranging civil freedoms, and those who aren't tend to be dragged off the streets by men in dark suits and hustled into cars with tinted windows.

Moralistic Democracy
Citizens are highly moralistic and fiercely conservative, in the sense that they tend to believe most things should be outlawed. People who have good jobs and work quietly at them are lauded; others are viewed with suspicion.

New York Times Democracy
Liberal democracy, with elections heavily influenced by the media.

Psychotic Dictatorship
Corrupt, authoritarian state where everyone is considered the leader's toy.

Right-wing Utopia
Citizens are free to succeed or fail in life on their own merits; the successful tend to enjoy an opulent (but moralistic) lifestyle, while the failures can be seen crowding out most jails.

Scandinavian Liberal Paradise
Citizens enjoy extensive civil rights and enjoy a level of social equality free from the usual accompanying government corruption.
High taxes, tons of civil freedom, but a weak economy.

Tyranny by Majority
Pure democracy without minority rights.

Liberal Democratic Socialists
Government that allows its citizens to vote and express opinions publicly while retaining a firm hold over the market where most products are simply labeled brand.

Oh, Reven NС remembered.
Well, with my Utopia, it's quite simple: everything is straightforward. However, if you allow them to do anything, they quickly devolve from being somewhat sane to completely corrupt, and you can't leave them alone for even a minute.

Ideally, I'd prefer a benevolent dictatorship, but these idiots either want to introduce same-sex marriage or install five golden toilets, and that's just in the shed at my aunt's dacha. Or they want slaves, or they decide to hold duels. I'm here fighting for the honorable title of a high standard of living, and then all sorts of things pop up, and I don't have enough resources.

The most challenging aspect of the poll is aligning the descriptions with the in-game situations where these features are actually granted to nations (for example, there are exceptions, although the discrepancy isn't significant). Another question is how accurate these descriptions are in real life (for instance, the description of the Scandinavian system seems rather odd; I can't say that it has a weak economy).
But overall, that's how it is. The descriptions are generally quite vague, so I voted for all the systems within which, in modern realities and from my perspective, it's possible to build something reasonably coherent.

I have another question: should the system be evaluated from an outside perspective, or based on the desire to live within it?

Why shoot the inhabitants instead of yourself?

If I were in charge, it would be a dictatorship. If I were just a regular citizen, then it would be a normal system))00
typical Russian government and Kosha.

It's good to be in charge in almost any system. But living...

I would like to live in Stalinist Russia, but only if I were Stalin.

I want to live in a country with a benevolent dictator (and I am the only one who can be that dictator).

Yes, this is my dictator. You can throw that constitution in the trash. Everything will be in the interests of the nation, so don't protest, calm down.

I would be interested to live in Nestor Ivanovich's peasant republic, but there are a couple of problems (besides the fact that the republic lasted only about a year):
1. It's unclear how this "utopia" would work in the long term. In the short term, it seems to have worked well.
2. Peasants are not very relevant now. And how anarchy would work in modern conditions is unclear.

In general, I don't see a functioning anarcho-system now, and I can't imagine what it might look like. Unfortunately.

Well, I guess it wasn't meant to be.

In a vacuum, any system is utopian in theory. But in reality, we have what we have. No, but here, for example, in Drakkon, I would live there; I designed it with the idea of a utopia in mind. But in the intended dystopian Kittypink, I wouldn't want to live. True, NS can't convey all the nuances of the idea, so in the end, it's something like a psychotic dictatorship, "Find 10 differences." P.S. I recently learned that the Great Leader Amelia Whiteclaw has published a book.

Ruling well is possible in almost any system. But living...

Even if I were to pursue only my own selfish interests, I still wouldn't agree to a Benevolent Dictatorship.

I recently learned that Great Chieftain Amelia Whiteclaw has published a book.

5th century BC

That's the gist of it.