Posts from What is your opinion about Heroes IV?

Heroes are upgrades, all creatures in the castle can be built, it's a commander hero rather than one of the units, it's the good old "attack-defense-spell power-knowledge" stats.

Well, I disagree with you here.
In Heroes 1, there are no upgrades!
In Heroes 2, there are upgrades, but not for all units...
In Heroes 3, there are upgrades for all creatures in the castle.
What we see is that there is development happening...
Furthermore, the fact that the hero has become not only a commander but also a fighter is also a development. The same applies to the hero's characteristics.
You can't stand still... you'll get covered in moss... :D
The world is changing, and we must change too...

Sincerely.

But in the end, the 5th part became the successor to the 3rd part... If not even the 2nd :rolleyes:

Sometimes excessive innovation leads to unfortunate consequences. I've already said that you can sew a fifth leg and a second tail onto a dog so that it "doesn't stand still, or it will grow moss." But whether the dog needs it or not is no one's concern... :o

P.S. And in general, stop portraying me as a staunch opponent of the 4th part :smile43:

But, I'm sorry, this is NOT Heroes! And I sincerely feel sorry for those people who, for various reasons, started their acquaintance with this wonderful game with the 4th installment.

Heroes is about upgrades, it's about all the creatures in the castle being buildable, it's about a hero-commander, not just one of the units, it's about the good old characteristics of "attack-defense-spells-knowledge."

If something doesn't suit you and you simply don't understand the fourth installment, there's no need to express yourself so categorically.:smile22: :smile22: :smile22:
P.S. And I can criticize the third game too, even though I like it.

I can criticize both Heroes III and Heroes of Might and Magic: The Succession Wars :o If I hated part 4 as much as you do and didn't understand anything about it, as you say, then why am I creating campaigns for it? :cool:

But in the end, the 5th installment became the successor to the 3rd... if not even the 2nd :rolleyes:

Sometimes, excessive innovation leads to unfortunate consequences. I've already said it – you can attach a fifth leg and a second tail to a dog so that it "doesn't stand still and get covered in moss." But whether the dog needs it or not – no one cares... :o

P.S. And in general, stop portraying me as a staunch opponent of the 4th installment :smile43:

Why don't you like the fact that the hero slays everything?

...But the fact that the hero fights is a good feature. However, it wasn't necessary to make him so strong. This created an imbalance, and the developers had to compensate by adding a large number of warriors to the enemy's army in the missions.