Auto-translated
I think everyone understands who the complaints are directed at. By the way, won't you tell us what substances you were taking on day 1 and night 2?:smile51: Maybe you're a clone of Dag, aren't you?
Posts from Mafia 102. Veliria
Злобный Ящур
Auto-translated
What substances?
The first kill was to test the version of the evidence.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Ment
Auto-translated
I support Yashur.
It is very important to receive information during the day – nighttime kills say almost nothing about player psychology. This is not a replacement for executions! It is a way to eliminate 98-100% of negative behavior! There should not be kills for information gathering.
During the day, when you can observe player behavior, you can execute them for information.
Злобный Ящур
Auto-translated
By the way, I wanted to ask some people here... Blocking someone by their nickname is bad, the player is revealed, and that's it. But exposing a Mafia member or someone else by blocking them – is that good?
P.S. And still, the Mafia member was weak. At least like Koshi, he should have the option to choose between kills with ignore protection or without it, and without eating protection is also not good. They could have eliminated him in the first night...
Added 46 minutes later
By the way, I completely forgot...
Thank you, comrade Fragment, for taking the Mafia role away from me.:D
P.S. And still, the Mafia member was weak. At least like Koshi, he should have the option to choose between kills with ignore protection or without it, and without eating protection is also not good. They could have eliminated him in the first night...
Added 46 minutes later
By the way, I completely forgot...
Thank you, comrade Fragment, for taking the Mafia role away from me.:D
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
KindShaman
Auto-translated
Well, they took out that cultist with two shots! It was like they planned it. By the way, the Mafia didn't immediately realize who they had blocked. And if the block had been revealed, all the Mafia would have been exposed as not being the murderer, and you would have been exposed as the murderer to everyone, so...
Драккошка
Auto-translated
And the madman is useful to the city.
А, вот почему.
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕
Злобный Ящур
Auto-translated
Well, they took out the cultist with two stray bullets. It was like they planned it.
Actually, the Mafia didn't immediately realize who they had blocked.
And if the block had been revealed, all the Mafia would have been exposed as not being the Maniac.
And you would have been exposed as the Maniac to everyone, so...
Added 3 minutes later
Actually, the Mafia didn't immediately realize who they had blocked.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Auto-translated
That's what I'm asking you.:smile29:
What should a gunslinger do? Correct, eliminate the negatives, not "investigate." A maniac can afford to kill someone "for investigation"... Jaconda was 100% a negative for you. Why didn't you go kill her?
Злобный Ящур
Auto-translated
lol, I wrote that she wasn't Mafia, but based on the clue, she could have been.
2. A maniac or cultist capable of "taking apart half the city" – isn't that a reason to eliminate them? When answering, please consider that this was at the beginning of the game, not on day 3, when you couldn't vote out the cultist anymore.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
KindShaman
Auto-translated
To all the noble lords of Valyria, let us part in peace).
Злобный Ящур
Auto-translated
No way... We really need to find the source of the evil that's preventing the city from playing properly. Otherwise, it will always be a question of "will the Mafia win without any losses, or not?" :smile51:
For example, "not trusting Yashchur" is now an axiom, beyond any doubt, right?
For example, "not trusting Yashchur" is now an axiom, beyond any doubt, right?
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Auto-translated
1. If it "wasn't a cultist," then why didn't it join Guru and start campaigning for her cause?
2. A maniac or cultist capable of "tearing half the city apart" is not a reason for elimination? When answering, please consider that this was at the beginning of the game, not the 3rd day, when the cultist could no longer be eliminated. ;)
Злобный Ящур
Auto-translated
just so you know, I didn't realize that the Dungeon faction won the game because they failed to attack Jaconda... :smile51:
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Auto-translated
Ehh...:confused:
Злобный Ящур
Auto-translated
I'm saying that the Mafia was the priority, which is why they won, and yes, it's a shame that the clue was incorrect, but the theory was definitely not bad.
Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).