Tournament Regulations for the "Novice" Tournament. — Tournament History

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!

Multiple choice Public votes Closed 2016-01-17

This poll is closed.

5 templates (play one after another on each)

13% 3 votes

5 templates (fonts)

73.9% 17 votes

3 templates (fonts)

17.4% 4 votes

5 without computers and 2 with computers

30.4% 7 votes

4 without computers and 3 with computers

43.5% 10 votes

best of 3 match starting from a score of 0-0

21.7% 5 votes

best of 3 match, with a score of 1-0

56.5% 13 votes

the final match of the Bo3 series, with the score at 1-0 in the series

17.4% 4 votes

templates in the final – cherk

65.2% 15 votes

the templates in the final stage – sequential selection

26.1% 6 votes

In reply to Dirty_Player

высокий

12/24/2015 3:36 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

I'm not presenting my opinion as the absolute truth, but I believe that such a "chance" isn't worth the time spent on the heroes. If we were talking about a game like Hearthstone, where a best-of-three match takes about 30 minutes, then in Heroes, it takes a month, or even two! Due to the excessive time wasted, as well as the low chances of victory for either of the losers, I believe that the double-elimination system is not suitable for Heroes. IMHO, of course.

Playing to two wins in the grand final with a score of 1-0 will only shorten the time. Let the loser try to prove that their loss was just a fluke.

In reply to Dirty_Player

Wicc

12/24/2015 3:51 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

Due to the excessive time wasted, as well as the low chances of any of the losers winning, I believe that the double elimination system is not suitable for Heroes. This is just my opinion, of course.

This could be supported with statistics from super finals.

In reply to Wicc

Dirty_Player

12/24/2015 6:29 PM UTC

Auto-translated

high

Playing a best-of-three match in the grand final with a score of 1-0 will only shorten the time. Let the loser try to prove that their defeat was a fluke.

The issue isn't about randomness or non-randomness. I'm thinking about something else, and I might be wrong; I'm not claiming to be right.

Wicc

This could be supported with statistics from super finals.

I was also thinking about that, but I don't have much time right now to go through the threads. But off the top of my head, there should be a significant bias towards the upper bracket.

In reply to Dirty_Player

Dark

12/24/2015 8:25 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

I was recently thinking about the issue of playing in the grand final and came to the conclusion that the winner should not have any advantages. I believe that the player who came through the losers' bracket has atoned for their mistakes, at least by winning one extra match, and if they went through several stages of the lower bracket, they have played a noticeably larger number of games.

I'll put it briefly: NOT TRUE!:rolleyes: Well, what can I say!

p/s

Wasting time is probably the biggest issue, with unnecessarily long deadlines! Many tournaments, such as those featuring favorite players or the "one for all" format, are examples of this!
It's easier to have shorter deadlines and make exceptions for someone in extreme cases than to do otherwise.

лето 2012.

In reply to Dirty_Player

KobRa_RR

12/24/2015 10:22 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

I'm not presenting my opinion as the absolute truth, but I believe that such a "chance" isn't worth the time spent on the heroes. If we were talking about a game like Hearthstone, where a BO3 match takes about 30 minutes, then in Heroes, it takes a month, or even two! Due to the excessive time wasted, as well as the low chances of victory for any of the losers, I believe that the double-elimination system is not suitable for Heroes. This is just my opinion, of course.

Exactly, it's better when each round of the playoffs is played as a BO3.

Jubi-Juby

1/1/2016 8:32 AM UTC

Auto-translated

When will registration for the "Newcomer" tournament start? I would like to participate in my second "Newcomer" tournament and try to win, as my gaming experience was only one month during the first "Newcomer" tournament.)))
P.S. If Hota or SoD were available as options for participants, it would be great! After all, Hota is also popular, and SoD has become monotonous.)))

ICQ 669307560

skd

1/3/2016 10:22 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Новичок Summer-15 has concluded. The regulations for the next "Новичок" need to be determined.
Based on the discussions in the thread, I have created a poll on the issues that caused disagreements, where multiple options can be selected.
Votes are accepted from players who have been registered on the site for more than 6 months and participate in HeroesWorld tournaments.
Please vote on the four criteria that you consider most optimal:

1) Template selection for the group stage:
1 - 5 templates (alternating play on each)
2 - 5 templates (veto)
3 - 3 templates (veto)

My proposal to use the most popular templates was, as I understood it, accepted.

2) Templates used in the tournament:
4 - 5 without computers and 2 with computers
5 - 4 without computers and 3 with computers

3) Conducting the tournament final:
6 - Final best of 5 from a 0-0 score (best of 5 series without advantage - this was in Новичок Summer-15)
7 - Final best of 5 from a 1-0 score (best of 5 series with the winner of the winners bracket having a 1 map advantage)
8 - Final consisting of best of 3 series, from a 1-0 series score (option proposed by Dandy, the final is played as a series of best of 3 matches, where the winner of the upper bracket needs to win one series, and the winner of the lower bracket needs to win 2 series)

4) Template selection in the final:
9 - Templates in the final - veto (template selection using the standard veto)
10 - Templates in the final - alternating pick (players alternately choose a template for a game without repetition, as was done in Новичок Summer-15)

UTC+03:00, icq 593626431

skd

1/16/2016 10:25 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Those who wanted to vote but haven't made their choice yet, please decide, as the voting closes tomorrow. And registration for the "Newcomer Winter" tournament is now open.

UTC+03:00, icq 593626431