Mafia 101. Disputed Island — Mafia

Sesame

12/13/2015 7:50 PM UTC

Auto-translated

And why did Vish get injured?

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

Злобный Ящур

12/13/2015 7:54 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Vish wasn't maimed. He was killed by Nancy (see the newspaper correction).

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).

Sesame

12/13/2015 8:26 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I keep forgetting about it. Okay, the scenario seems plausible. Although, I have the same question about isolation. I actually envisioned the events of that night a bit differently, but I also decided that Ment was wandering around somewhere at night. This is a clear indication that womanizing doesn't lead to good things.

Added after 58 seconds
But then it turns out that we have evidence against Zero. Well, who will connect it to Snow or Heck?

Added after 13 minutes
And the second question is, who did Lee attack? The mana, who can't be killed? Zero? And why did he survive if he only has protection against physical attacks, and there should also have been psychic damage.

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

In reply to Sesame

Gekasan_RU

12/13/2015 8:29 PM UTC

Auto-translated

and why are you immediately addressing me? don't you want to address yourself?

Sesame

12/13/2015 8:34 PM UTC

Auto-translated

good morning, Gek.

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

Злобный Ящур

12/13/2015 8:39 PM UTC

Auto-translated

The only thing that comes to mind is that Mental Lee did kill, but not with her ultimate, but with a delayed kill after Rick (aka Nancy) hit with his club yesterday... But that doesn't quite fit either, because the ultimate goes first, and it's supposed to replace the delayed kill:smile32:

Added after 53 seconds

Sesame

And the second question is, who did Lee target? Mana, who can't be killed? Zero? And why did he survive if he only has protection against physical attacks, and there should also be psychic damage.

Zero doesn't die from psychic attacks.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).

Sesame

12/13/2015 8:43 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Yeah, that’s more interesting. I’ve been slacking lately. Okay, then I want your version to be true.

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

In reply to Злобный Ящур

Fragment

12/13/2015 8:44 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Moskvitin I.Yu. - Poyarkov V.D. - cannibalism - Solomon Islands - Fiji

And the old man is no fool!

Sesame

12/13/2015 8:45 PM UTC

Auto-translated

By the way, what kind of killing ability did Nancy use? Was it something from the urban NDs or a newly acquired one?

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

In reply to Sesame

Злобный Ящур

12/13/2015 8:51 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Sesame

By the way, what kind of killing ability did Nancy use? Is it something from the urban RPGs or a newly acquired one?

What difference does it make?

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).

Sesame

12/13/2015 8:54 PM UTC

Auto-translated

I can't understand what kind of ND she received. One is some kind of defense, most likely physical, but what is the second one?

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

In reply to Sesame

Злобный Ящур

12/13/2015 8:55 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Sesame

But then it turns out that we have evidence against Zero.
So, who will link it to Snow or Heka?

By the way, I also get Zero, either Snow or Hekasan.

Ничто не возникает из ничего и ничто не пропадает бесследно.
Если где-то чего-то убудет, то в другом месте добавится.
(Закон сохранения).

In reply to Sesame

Kent305

12/13/2015 8:58 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Sesame

By the way, what kind of attack did Nancy use to kill? Was it something from the urban NDs or a newly acquired skill?

Only infection could have been from the urban ones, but it's clearly not infection here.
Or could it be that the Cop was going to isolate Zero, the Chinese woman attacked Zero, injured the Cop, and disrupted the isolation, which is why it didn't show up? Or am I talking nonsense?

Sesame

12/13/2015 9:00 PM UTC

Auto-translated

it could, by the way

..разым двазым трызым рызым пята лата сигерь мата локом боком крюк за крюк из бульмы бульма урюк..
Знание некоторых закономерностей освобождает от изучения многих фактов.
Мечты сбываются рано или поздно, так или иначе.

Kent305

12/13/2015 9:32 PM UTC

Auto-translated

SnowmanV2 and Gakasan_RU, you're the first ones I'm addressing. Tell me, who do you consider to be on the "good" side, and who do you consider to be on the "bad" side?

Added 5 minutes later
By the way, Vishmaster was Cornelius, which means he was likely checking the secondary statuses of someone.

He wrote a little in the thread, but here are a couple of interesting messages:

Besides those who have already been mentioned, there's also some suspicious "Snowman"... But I wouldn't want to eliminate him right now. It's better to execute someone based on evidence, like Alex, for example. Many people seem to think he's the answer, but they're still voting for me.

Although, after reading Snowman's new post, I'm starting to think he's more likely on the "good" side. For now, I don't want to eliminate Alex and cause a "no new victim" situation, but if better candidates emerge, I'll reconsider.

What do you think, is Vishmaster hinting at the results of the check here, and what are those results?