Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
in short, I don't know much about the Soviet Union, but I can definitely say that I know people who lived there, and the vast majority of them say that life was much better there than it is now!! and I share that opinion.
Клан"Yan-luo-Wan" Зло как и добро имеет своих героев!!!
In short, I don't know much about the Soviet Union, but I can definitely say that I know people who lived there, and the vast majority of them say that life was much better there than it is now! And I share that opinion.
Please explain what exactly made that life better than the one we have now?
lopetos
Auto-translated
from what I've heard, life used to be more interesting and fun! There used to be an idea, and when there's an idea, it's much easier to live!
Added 2 minutes later
and in present-day Russia, the only idea is money, and everyone is going crazy because of it.
Клан"Yan-luo-Wan" Зло как и добро имеет своих героев!!!
In short, I don't know much about the Soviet Union, but I can definitely say that I know people who lived there, and the vast majority of them say that life was much better there than it is now! And I share that opinion.
There are different opinions, because for some people, freedom, which was somewhat lacking, is very important, while for others, order is more important.
Умирает не тот, кто устал, а тот, кто остановился.
lopetos
Auto-translated
of course, there is no such society where everyone is happy.
Клан"Yan-luo-Wan" Зло как и добро имеет своих героев!!!
lopetos;84796from what I've heard, it used to be more interesting and cheerful to live! There used to be an idea, and when there is an idea, living is much easier!
Added after 2 minutes but in today's Russia, the only idea is money, and everyone is going crazy because of itWhat idea (which was, according to you, present before but is not now) are you talking about? Explain. In my opinion, whether in the USSR (and we often judge it by Soviet films) or in today's Russia, the main idea is money, or its intangible expression—perks, for which people join various organizations regardless of their views. Another favorite Russian concept characteristic of the USSR is "khalyava" (freebies). Now that's an idea. For a stable salary, the people are ready to gaze faithfully toward the bright communist horizons, sometimes forgetting to look around and ask themselves where we are heading.
lopetos
Auto-translated
SO, WHERE WERE WE GOING, I WONDER???
Added 9 minutes later
and by the way, I'm judging based on the USSR, NOT on movies, but on the stories of people who lived there, and they know everything, and they practically didn't think about money at all!
Клан"Yan-luo-Wan" Зло как и добро имеет своих героев!!!
Added 9 minutes later and by the way, I'm judging based on the USSR, NOT on movies, but on the stories of people who lived there. And they really didn't think about money at all!
Where were we heading? Let's rephrase the question: where COULD we have been heading? Two possible scenarios come to mind: 1) Towards communism. I don't think there are people on this forum who believe that communism is a good thing. 2) Towards some kind of imitation of communism. In this case, the USSR was one big fiction, because the main goal of this state – building a communist society – was not realized, and all communists were big deceivers. lopetos, I'm glad for those people who didn't think about money at all. They must be unique.
Берсерк
Auto-translated
"This state, during the period of collectivization, killed over a million of its most capable citizens, breaking the back of the Russian peasantry (and let's not just blame Stalin for this, but rather appreciate Marx and understand that the collective farm, albeit in a more rigid form, is an integral part of this system), and you say that it cared for its people. And what kind of care was it? It was care without any right to personal initiative."
Absolutely correct. The Hive is a state that combines the incompatible. It's like the Matrix, and Alexey and the others are like the traitor from the movie who betrayed his team just to return to the pleasant times, rather than the harsh reality. (only here, they don't betray, but sigh :) )
Prices, music, movies - all of this can be organized even with a normal state structure. You simply like it, but it has nothing to do with the USSR specifically. It's about the people and their mindset, their mentality.
And I'm also amazed by your mass pseudo-patriotism on the forum.
Someone wrote: "Before, we only focused on America, but now we have to reckon even with Latvia and Estonia."
Your words are frankly disgusting. And what, are they not countries? And what's wrong with them? Russia is the heart of the USSR, and the USSR is the same, only smaller. Hundreds of peoples, who have nothing in common, were forcibly included in the Empire/Federation and cannot leave of their own free will. The same was true for the USSR. A crisis was brewing; a country consisting of dozens of completely different countries cannot exist. History proves this. The empire of Alexander the Great collapsed 10 years after his death. All empires (the Arab Caliphate, for example) collapsed either after the death of their leaders or slowly moved towards that. Unite Ukraine and China and call it the UKS (Ukrainian-Chinese Union), and what? What do they have in common? Culture? Language? Religion? At the cost of thousands of lives, the death of the best people and intellectuals, the USSR reached its level, but the current generation has been "cleansed" of intellect and religion. The experiment to breed "cattle" was successful. I don't like the USSR, I don't like the Pioneers, I don't like anything related to those times. And, as always, everything said here is IMHO and does not claim to be the absolute truth.
This state, during the time of collectivization, killed more than a million of its most hardworking citizens, breaking the back of the Russian peasantry (and let's not blame only Stalin for this, but rather read Marx and understand that the kolkhoz, just in a harsher form, is an inherent part of this system).
And I don't blame Stalin for everything (where did you even get that idea?). It is foolish to blame Stalin alone for the deaths of millions. And who killed those millions? Other people, just like them. I do not justify the methods of the USSR from the 20s to the 50s, but in 30 years the country rose from the ruins (and don't tell me that the cause of the civil war was the emergence of the communists led by Lenin. He just happened to be in the right place at the right time, just as Yeltsin was in 1991). Moreover, don't forget that it did this twice.
Added after 6 minutes Гур;84760
... and let's rather read Marx and understand that the kolkhoz, just in a harsher form, is an inherent part of this system...
To understand that the kolkhoz is an inherent part of that system, there is no need to read Marx; it is obvious, just as a free market is under a democracy.
Added after 5 minutes Гур;84760
... and you say that it cared for its people. What kind of care was it? It was care without any right to personal initiative.
It cared in the 60s - 80s. As for personal initiative... In some fields of activity, you were hit over the head for it, and in some, it was encouraged. However, it is the same now under democracy.
Added after 12 minutes Гур;84911
For me, whether in the USSR (and we often judge it by Soviet films) or in today's Russia, the main idea is money, or its non-material expression — perks, for the sake of which people, despite their views, join various organizations. Another favorite Russian concept, characteristic of the USSR, is "khalyava" (freebies). That is the idea. For the sake of a stable salary, the people are ready to gaze faithfully into the bright communist distances, sometimes forgetting to look around and ask where we are heading.
Money has been the main idea in any human community from the moment it was invented. "Khalyava" is a concept characteristic of Russia as well. Where to steal something for free, where to get a job so as to do nothing and earn a lot — admit it, you've heard similar statements more than once from the people you communicate with. And for the sake of a stable salary and confidence in tomorrow, people will gaze into any distances, whether communist, democratic, or whatever else. If you want a comparison between the USSR and Russia (or if you want communism and democracy): Under communism, you decide nothing in the country and you know that you decide nothing. Under democracy, you are convinced by all means that you have the opportunity to decide the fate of the country, but you still decide nothing in the country. If you want more: Communism is accused of not accepting other forms of government. And what do we see now? Talk that this country is undemocratic and that one over there is too, and that democracy must be urgently imposed upon them, even by force. It turns out to be the same rejection of other forms of government as in communism.
Added after 2 minutes Гур;84917
2) to some semblance of communism. In this case, the USSR is one big fiction, since the main goal of this state — the construction of a communist system — was not realized, and all communists are great deceivers.
Just like the construction of absolute democracy. And democrats are just as much deceivers.
Added after 7 minutes Берсерк;84925
Absolutely correct. A bloody power combining the incompatible. It's like the Matrix, and Alexei and the others are like the traitor from the movie who betrayed the team just to return to the sweet times rather than the harsh reality. (only here they don't betray, they sigh :) )
Bloody? — yes. Do you know of any countries without bloody pages in their history? I sigh not because it would be nice to return there, but because now our rulers want to do almost nothing for the well-being and prosperity of their country.
Added after 3 minutes Берсерк;84925
Prices, music, movies — all this can be organized under a normal state system. You simply like it, but it doesn't relate strictly to the USSR. It's the people and their mindset, mentality.
What idea (which, according to you, existed before but doesn't exist now) are you talking about? Please explain. In my opinion, whether it's the USSR (and we often judge it based on Soviet films) or today's Russia, the main idea is money, or its intangible expression – benefits, for which people, contrary to their views, join various organizations. Another favorite Russian concept, characteristic of the USSR, is "getting something for free." That's the idea. For a stable salary, people are ready to look faithfully towards the bright communist future, sometimes forgetting to look around and ask themselves where we are heading.
As a person who experienced the late years of the USSR and the post-Soviet era, I will say (in support of lopetos) that life was simpler and more peaceful for many in the USSR. Although, when compared to the present time, that life seems boring and monotonous, but any person knows how to adapt to the situation. And now, is it better? ... more freedom ... that's good!! But this freedom is in everything, and people are flawed, and they often use freedom not for good purposes, and once they feel impunity, it becomes the norm of life... and gradually, this freedom exists for some, but not for others. Such freedom is not needed by anyone! Before, people were at least afraid of something... public opinion, some kind of order, but now everyone does what they want. And there are two paths: either to grovel before those who use this freedom for their own purposes, or to become just as vile or despicable as they are...
P.S. So, people need some kind of framework, limitations. Complete freedom can only be given to yogis, gurus, monks, etc... and even then, only because they know how to limit themselves. At least we haven't reached a generation that can use freedom wisely yet. And we are definitely not heading in that direction, but... who knows where!:mad:
And I am also struck by your widespread pseudo-patriotism on the forum.
Someone wrote: "We used to focus only on America, but now we have to consider even Latvia and Estonia." Your words are frankly disgusting. And what, are they not countries? And how are they worse than Russia? Russia is the heart of the USSR, and it is the same USSR, only smaller.
They are not worse in any way, but this is in an absolute sense. And in a practical sense :) in some ways they are worse, in some ways they are better.
Added 15 minutes ago Berserk;84925
Hundreds of peoples who have nothing in common, who were forcibly included in the Empire/Federation and who cannot leave by their own free will. The same was true of the USSR. A crisis was brewing; a country consisting of dozens of completely different countries cannot exist. History is proof of this. The empire of Alexander the Great collapsed 10 years after his death. All empires (the Arab Caliphate, for example) collapsed either after the death of their leaders or slowly moved towards that. Unite Ukraine and China and call it the UKS (Ukrainian-Chinese Union), and what? What do they have in common? Culture? Language? Religion?
It's just that humanity has not yet grown to normal relations between different value systems of different peoples (something like: "Love your neighbor as yourself"), and it is difficult to say when it will grow up, and whether it will grow up at all.
Added 1 minute ago Berserk;84925
And, as usual, everything said here is IMHO, and does not claim to be the absolute truth.
I don't blame Stalin for everything (and I don't even know where you got that from). It's silly to blame Stalin alone for the deaths of millions. And who killed those millions? Just other people. I'm not saying that you specifically blame Stalin. It's just that many people who excuse the atrocities of the communists tend to do this. They say, "It wasn't us, it was all Stalin." And also, Sage, your comparison of communism and democracy isn't quite accurate. It's like comparing an orange to a rhinoceros. Which one is better? Democracy is a type of political regime (democratic, authoritarian, totalitarian), and communism is a socio-economic formation (primitive communal, slave-owning, feudal system, capitalism, communism). So, if communism is to be compared to anything in this case, it should be compared to capitalism.
Added 7 minutes later Bloody? - yes. But do you know of any countries without bloody pages in their history? I'm not sighing because I think it would be nice to go back there, but because our current rulers don't want to do almost anything for the well-being and prosperity of their country.
Rulers, rulers... Sage, maybe a slightly rhetorical question: what have you... no, what have we, all those present on the forum, done for the prosperity of our country?
Sage;85019And also, Sage, your comparison of communism and democracy is not entirely accurate. It's like comparing an orange and a rhinoceros. Which one is better? Democracy is a type of political regime (democratic, authoritarian, totalitarian), while communism is a socio-economic formation (primitive communal, slave-owning, feudal system, capitalism, communism). So, if communism is to be compared to anything in this case, it should be compared to capitalism.
Thank you for correcting me. I was actually referring to a comparison between democracy and a totalitarian regime.
Added after 37 minutes Gur;85047
Rulers, rulers... Sage, perhaps a slightly rhetorical question: what have you... no, what have we, all those present on the forum, done for the prosperity of our country?
I work as an engineer at a state-owned enterprise. I pay taxes accordingly. The enterprise where I work could provide much more benefit if the state allocated funds for research. And another example from life: a person invented a very efficient engine, and came to the deputy minister with it (whom he knew before). And what did he hear from him? "This is good, of course, but you see, we are here busy filling our own pockets, because we are only here for 4 years, so don't expect any support from us." And this person made an invention for his country, worked for its benefit. And this is far from an isolated case. By the way, high-ranking politicians love to ask your rhetorical question, why do you think that is? Well, as they say now, they are shifting the blame. As if you are to blame for everything that is wrong in the country.