Posts from [POLL] AK and other weapon customization

Your tone and choice of context for the post give you away.

In your poll, I was particularly impressed by the wide range of votes for Daw-Za across all categories :D

I once suggested introducing some kind of "passing score" for polls, let's say 33% (this is negotiable). For example, you come up with an idea that seems good to you and decide to create a poll, but it turns out that your idea isn't as great as you thought, and the forum doesn't support it, and you don't get the desired 33% of votes. In this case, it's no longer a poll, but rather spam, and spam should be followed by some kind of punishment (also negotiable). This way, we can rid the forum of unnecessary polls, and anyone who decides to create them will first ask people in ICQ/private message whether they even need them.

He's just jealous that Vikka's polls are more popular. That's why he decided to ruin the ballots.

I think you're being too harsh with the punishments (no smileys in the message, and your nickname isn't blue).
Maybe it would be worth giving social polls more weight in all votes, and having someone create polls that change something important (especially in the game).

perhaps it would be worth assigning the value of social polls to all votes, and creating "someone" for polls that change something important (especially in the game).

Maybe I am exaggerating, that’s why I wrote that the punishment is debatable, but maybe I’m not exaggerating. How, for example, does a poll about “making the Inferno portal cheaper” differ from ordinary spam? There are penalty points for spam, but not for this. The idea is, of course, raw and needs to be refined, but there should be some kind of regulation on “Conducting Polls.”

It’s already like that, it’s just not written down anywhere, so people think they have more rights and opportunities. And of course, it would be nice to write all this down, but Pete probably doesn’t need it, i.e., it’s more convenient for him this way.

Polls regarding changes to the rules or regulations should be organized by those responsible for them, not just anyone.

if it's not written down, it doesn't exist (tautology), more likely the others are just lazy or do it with the wrong "emphasis," which is why it's not taken seriously.

You don't understand me; I'm telling you that even though it's not written anywhere, any polls here have the status of a social survey, or even no status at all. Only polls initiated by Pete and possibly Dirty have any significance for changing something on the portal.

How are these two better than other members of the Arbitration Committee or the forum representatives in general?

You don't understand me; I'm telling you that even though it's not written anywhere, any polls here have the status of a social survey, or even no status at all. Only polls initiated by Pete and possibly Dirty have any significance for changing something on the portal.

That’s exactly the point – it’s not written down. And if it’s not written down, then either it needs to be written down or people need to stop acting like they know everything. That’s what I’m saying: lately, too much on Hv has been done “based on unwritten rules.”

Moreover, I’m not against writing it down, introducing the position of “King of all Hv” with any more or less adequate candidate for the position. In my opinion, this is better than democratic chaos.